An examination of UK companies' modern slavery disclosure practices: Does board gender diversity matter?

被引:11
|
作者
Moussa, Tantawy [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Allam, Amir [1 ]
Elmarzouky, Mahmoud [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Westminster, Westminster Business Sch, London, England
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Commerce, Giza, Egypt
[3] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Birmingham, Warwickshire, England
[4] Univ Westminster, Westminster Business Sch, 35 Marylebone Rd, London NW1 5LS, England
关键词
board gender diversity; corporate governance; critical mass theory; gender socialisation theory; modern slavery disclosures; sustainable development goals; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FIRM PERFORMANCE; SUPPLY CHAINS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; WOMEN; GOVERNANCE; DIRECTORS; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3426
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals persuade governments and businesses to fight modern slavery as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The UK government took the initiative by introducing the Modern Slavery Act in 2015. Despite this, little is known about how companies disclose information about their efforts to tackle modern slavery as required by the Act and the role of corporate governance as a determinant of modern slavery disclosure (MSD) levels. This study, therefore, investigates the extent to which companies engage in MSD and empirically examines the impact of board gender diversity (BGD) on MSD. Based on a content analysis of FTSE 100 companies' modern slavery statements during the 2016-2020 period, we find that MSD improved over time but is still relatively low. Our results show that companies pay less attention to the core practices of modern slavery, such as key performance indicators (KPIs), due diligence procedures, risk assessment and management, and training. This evidence suggests that companies tend to comply with the Act by focusing largely on symbolic structures rather than providing a comprehensive disclosure of their impacts on modern slavery practices to minimise regulatory risks and manage stakeholders' perceptions. We also find that boards with greater female representation have a positive and significant association with MSD. This finding is consistent with the gender socialisation theory in that women are more sensitive to communal values and ethics. Consequently, companies with a greater proportion of female directors are more transparent about their strategies and actions related to fighting modern slavery. Furthermore, a critical mass of at least four female directors is necessary before any positive impact on MSD can be observed. Our findings shed new light on this under-researched area and the role of female directors in addressing modern slavery risk and can be of interest to companies, policymakers, and other stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:5382 / 5402
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Examining the relationship between CEO power and modern slavery disclosures: The moderating role of board gender diversity in UK companies
    Allam, Amir
    Moussa, Tantawy
    Elmarzouky, Mahmoud
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 33 (08) : 8067 - 8085
  • [2] Biodiversity disclosure, sustainable development and environmental initiatives: Does board gender diversity matter?
    Carvajal, Mariela
    Nadeem, Muhammad
    Zaman, Rashid
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (03) : 969 - 987
  • [3] The impact of the UK's Modern Slavery Act (2015) on the disclosure of FTSE 100 companies
    Mai, Nam
    Vourvachis, Petros
    Grubnic, Suzana
    BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 55 (03):
  • [4] Does gender diversity in forest sector companies matter?
    Hansen, Eric
    Conroy, Kendall
    Toppinen, Anne
    Bull, Lyndall
    Kutnar, Andreja
    Panwar, Rajat
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2016, 46 (11) : 1255 - 1263
  • [5] Does board diversity matter in the disclosure process? An analysis of the association between diversity and the disclosure of information on risks
    Bravo F.
    International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2018, 15 (2) : 104 - 114
  • [6] Does board gender diversity affect the transparency of corporate political disclosure?
    DeBoskey, D. G.
    Luo, Yan
    Wang, Jeff
    ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2018, 26 (04) : 444 - 463
  • [7] Board gender diversity and ESG decoupling: Does religiosity matter?
    Eliwa, Yasser
    Aboud, Ahmed
    Saleh, Ahmed
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (07) : 4046 - 4067
  • [8] The Influence of Board Factors and Gender Diversity on the ESG Disclosure Score: A Study on Indian Companies
    Bhatia, Shikha
    Marwaha, Divya
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2022, 23 (06) : 1544 - 1557
  • [9] Board gender diversity and corporate carbon commitment: Does industry matter?
    Lemma, Tesfaye T.
    Tavakolifar, Mohammad
    Mihret, Dessalegn
    Samkin, Grant
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 32 (06) : 3550 - 3568
  • [10] Block ownership and CEO compensation: does board gender diversity matter?
    Ullah, Farid
    Jiang, Ping
    Shahab, Yasir
    Li, Hai-Xia
    Xu, Lei
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (06) : 583 - 597