共 50 条
Effect of a Senior Cardiology Nursing Role on Streamlining Assessment of Emergency Cardiology Presentations During COVID-19: An Observational Study
被引:1
|作者:
Weaver, Mark James
[1
]
Mok, Desmond
[2
]
Hughes, Ian
[3
,4
]
Hattingh, H. Laetitia
[3
,5
]
机构:
[1] Gold Coast Hlth, Specialist Med Serv, Med, Southport, Qld, Australia
[2] Gold Coast Hlth, Med, Southport, Qld, Australia
[3] Gold Coast Hlth, Off Res Governance & Dev, 1 Hosp Blvd, Southport, Qld 4215, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Griffith Univ, Sch Pharm & Med Sci, Southport, Qld, Australia
来源:
关键词:
Cardiac assessment;
Cardiology consultation;
Cardiology coordinator;
Chest pain;
Emergency department;
Nurse;
RISK-FACTORS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.hlc.2023.02.012
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Introduction The Emergency Cardiology Coordinator (ECC) was a senior nursing role implemented from 14 April 2020 to 15 September 2020 at the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service in South-East Queensland, Australia to streamline and expedite assessment of patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with suspected cardiac problems. ECC implementation occurred in the context of the emergence of COVID-19. Evaluation of the impact of the ECC role focussed primarily on the time interval from triage to cardiology consult (TTCC).Methods ED and Cardiology Department data were extracted from electronic medical records for the period 2 September 2019 to 1 March 2021. The TTCC for each presenting problem (chest pain, palpitations, shortness of breath, altered level of consciousness) was compared between patients seen by the ECC and those not seen on the days the ECC worked. The effect of COVID-19 on TTCC was assessed by an interrupted time series analysis. Data recorded by the ECC included patients seen and interventions provided.Results The ECC saw 378 patients. Most presented with chest pain (269/378, 71.2%). The ECC determined that 68.8% (260/378) required a cardiac assessment. Following COVID-19 the median weekly TTCC increased by 0.029 hours (1.74 min) each week on average relative to that beforehand (p=0.008). For patients seen by the ECC the median TTCC was 2.07 hours (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.44, 3.16) compared to 2.58 hours (IQR: 1.73, 3.80; p=0.007) for patients not seen by the ECC. Chest pain (ECC: 1.94 hours; no ECC: 2.41 hours; p=0.06) and non-obvious cardiac presenting problems (ECC: 1.77 hours; no ECC 3.05 hours; p=0.004) displayed the largest reductions in TTCC when the ECC was involved. Presentations with palpitations, respiratory distress and altered level of consciousness had similar TTCCs. Conclusion The ECC role resulted in an overall decrease in TTCC despite the role coinciding with the emergence of COVID-19. In order to clarify the optimal strategy for the ECC role, further analyses involving patient risk factors and presenting problems along with a health economic evaluation of this model of care and the effect on patient outcomes will be required.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 611
页数:8
相关论文