Additive Manufacturing and Upper-Limb Orthoses: A Scoping Review

IntroductionAdditive manufacturing has the potential to revolutionize the orthotic fabrication process for health professionals. Although there is evidence to suggest the benefits of additive manufacturing in rehabilitation-related fields, there is still fairly limited evidence supporting the use of 3D-printed orthoses as an effective and feasible alternative to manually fabricated devices used for the upper limb (UL). The purpose of this scoping review was to examine how 3D printers are currently being used in UL orthotic fabrication within the scope of rehabilitation professionals.MethodsA literature search was conducted using five databases from 2011 to 2021. Two independent researchers reviewed the abstracts and full text of the articles. The PRISMA process was used to report findings, and data extraction and charting were completed according to the JBI-suggested scoping review protocol.ResultsThirty-three studies were reviewed as determined by inclusion criteria from various disciplines and countries. Eight diagnostic categories identifying indications for use were derived from the studies including arthritic conditions, burns/contractures and wound care, finger deformities, neurological and neuromuscular disorders, and traumatic, strain, and nerve injuries. Both benefits and challenges are identified with the use of 3D-printed orthoses.ConclusionsThe scope of the 3D-printed orthoses produced in this review is broad and internationally widespread. More evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for each of the identified conditions, but the benefits outside of healing are obvious. The current state of the evidence suggests that this technology remains exploratory in respect to UL orthoses and is therefore not yet ready to be implemented in clinics. With appropriate supports and more evidence, 3D printing still has the potential to revolutionize the UL orthotic fabrication process.Clinical RelevanceIt may be unrealistic for rehabilitation professionals to design and fabricate 3D-printed orthoses without the proper education or time, but it is important for health care professionals to have an emphasized presence in this conversation, as it is their responsibility to treat the patients. This suggests that co-design, combining professionals' expertise, might be the best approach to fabricating these devices for patients.