Assessment of sea ice thickness simulations in the CMIP6 models with CICE components

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Mengliu [1 ]
Li, Junde [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Oceanog, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
sea ice thickness; PIOMAS; CICE MME; CMIP6; Arctic Ocean; OCEAN MODEL; VARIABILITY; SENSITIVITY; CRYOSAT-2; DECLINE; PIOMAS; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fmars.2023.1223772
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Arctic sea ice plays a critical role in modulating our global climate system and the exchange of heat fluxes in the polar region, but its impact on climate varies across different sea ice thickness (SIT) categories. Compared to sea ice cover, the performance of ice models in simulating SIT has been less evaluated, particularly in the sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase (CMIP6). Here, we chose 12 CMIP6 models with the Community Ice Code model (CICE) components and compared their SIT simulations with the satellite observations and the Pan-Arctic Ice Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS) model between 1980 and 2014. Our results show that the seasonal cycle of the PIOMAS SIT is consistent with satellite observations. Compared to the PIOMAS reanalysis, the multi-model ensemble mean (MME) well represents the sea ice extent in both the thin ice (<0.6 m) and thick ice (> 3.6 m). However, the MME SIT has larger biases in the Chukchi Sea, the Beaufort Sea, the central Arctic, and the Greenland Sea during winter and mainly in the central Arctic during summer. Both the MME and PIOMAS show decreasing trends in SIT over the entire Arctic Ocean in all seasons, but the interannual variability of SIT in MME is smaller than that in PIOMAS. Among the 12 CMIP6 models, the FIO-ESM-2.0 model shows the best simulation of the annual mean SIT, but the SAM0-UNICON and NESM3 models have the largest biases in the climatological mean SIT over the Arctic Ocean. We also demonstrate that the FIO-ESM-2.0 performs the best in the seasonal cycles of SIT. Our study suggests that more attention should be paid to the coupling of the CICE model with ocean and atmosphere models, which is vital to improving the SIT simulation in CMIP6 models and to better understanding the impact of Arctic sea ice on our climate system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Change in CMIP6’s Historical Simulations
    Lanying Chen
    Renhao Wu
    Qi Shu
    Chao Min
    Qinghua Yang
    Bo Han
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2023, 40 : 2331 - 2343
  • [2] The Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Change in CMIP6's Historical Simulations
    Chen, Lanying
    Wu, Renhao
    Shu, Qi
    Min, Chao
    Yang, Qinghua
    Han, Bo
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2023, 40 (12) : 2331 - 2343
  • [3] The Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Change in CMIP6's Historical Simulations
    Lanying CHEN
    Renhao WU
    Qi SHU
    Chao MIN
    Qinghua YANG
    Bo HAN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2023, (12) : 2331 - 2343
  • [4] Simulations and Projections of Winter Sea Ice in the Barents Sea by CMIP6 Climate Models
    Pan, Rongrong
    Shu, Qi
    Song, Zhenya
    Wang, Shizhu
    He, Yan
    Qiao, Fangli
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2023, 40 (12) : 2318 - 2330
  • [5] Simulations and Projections of Winter Sea Ice in the Barents Sea by CMIP6 Climate Models
    Rongrong Pan
    Qi Shu
    Zhenya Song
    Shizhu Wang
    Yan He
    Fangli Qiao
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2023, 40 : 2318 - 2330
  • [6] Simulations and Projections of Winter Sea Ice in the Barents Sea by CMIP6 Climate Models
    Rongrong PAN
    Qi SHU
    Zhenya SONG
    Shizhu WANG
    Yan HE
    Fangli QIAO
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2023, 40 (12) : 2318 - 2330
  • [7] Arctic Sea Ice in CMIP6
    Notz, Dirk
    Doerr, Jakob
    Bailey, David A.
    Blockley, Ed
    Bushuk, Mitchell
    Debernard, Jens Boldingh
    Dekker, Evelien
    DeRepentigny, Patricia
    Docquier, David
    Fuckar, Neven S.
    Fyfe, John C.
    Jahn, Alexandra
    Holland, Marika
    Hunke, Elizabeth
    Iovino, Doroteaciro
    Khosravi, Narges
    Madec, Gurvan
    Massonnet, Francois
    O'Farrell, Siobhan
    Petty, Alek
    Rana, Arun
    Roach, Lettie
    Rosenblum, Erica
    Rousset, Clement
    Semmler, Tido
    Stroeve, Julienne
    Toyoda, Takahiro
    Tremblay, Bruno
    Tsujino, Hiroyuki
    Vancoppenolle, Martin
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (10)
  • [8] Multi-Aspect Assessment of CMIP6 Models for Arctic Sea Ice Simulation
    Long, Mengyuan
    Zhang, Lujun
    Hu, Siyu
    Qian, Shimeng
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (04) : 1515 - 1529
  • [9] Assessment of Sea Ice Extent in CMIP6 With Comparison to Observations and CMIP5
    Shu, Qi
    Wang, Qiang
    Song, Zhenya
    Qiao, Fangli
    Zhao, Jiechen
    Chu, Min
    Li, Xinfang
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (09)
  • [10] An Assessment of the Oceanic Physical and Biogeochemical Components of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models for the Ross Sea Region
    Rickard, Graham J.
    Behrens, Erik
    Bahamondes Dominguez, Angela A.
    Pinkerton, Matt H.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2023, 128 (03)