The role of FDG uptake to predict the need for re-irradiation in patients treated with 8 Gy (X-ray) single fraction palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases

被引:0
|
作者
Kuzhan, A. [1 ]
Adli, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Denizli, Turkiye
[2] Marmara Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Bone metastasis; FDG uptake; re-irradiation; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; LOCAL-CONTROL; RADIATION-THERAPY; F-18-FDG PET/CT; PAIN RESPONSE; NECK CANCER; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.61186/ijrr.21.4.693
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The study aims to evaluate the relationship between the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) before radiation therapy (RT) and the further need for reirradiation (re-RT) in patients with bone metastases (BM), and to predict the complete response using pre-treatment SUVmax. Materials and Methods: Fifty-three patients with 133 painful BMs were accepted into the study. Pain scores and SUVmax at painful BM were recorded. Eight Gray in single fraction palliative RT was administered to all of the patients. A total of 7 patients (8 osseous lesions) underwent re-RT. Factors associated with re-RT were analyzed using Cox regression analysis. Results: The ideal SUVmax cut-off to predict complete response was 7.95. Median SUVmax was 12.75 (+/- 4.1) and 7 (+/- 3.36) in patients who required re-RT due to pain progression and in those who did not, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: FDG uptake may be predictive of the need for re-RT in patients with painful BM. This may impact decisions with single-fraction RT which is associated with higher rates of partial response and further need for re-RT at the same location in patients with high SUVmax. Pre-treatment FDG uptake also may be useful in predicting a complete response.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 698
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Single 4 Gy re-irradiation for painful bone metastasis following single fraction radiotherapy
    Jeremic, B
    Shibamoto, Y
    Igrutinovich, I
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1999, 52 (02) : 123 - 127
  • [2] Should all patients with uncomplicated bone metastases be treated with a single 8-Gy fraction?
    Lo, Simon S.
    Holden, Lori
    Lutz, Stephen T.
    Liu, Rico K.
    Chow, Edward
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (02) : 95 - 98
  • [3] A Study of re-radiation rate after 8 gy single fraction radiotherapy to symptomatic bone metastases
    Juneja, S.
    Bradley, K. L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S891 - S891
  • [4] Randomized clinical trial with two palliative radiotherapy regimens in painful bone metastases: 30 Gy in 10 fractions compared with 8 Gy in single fraction
    Foro Arnalot, Palmira
    Valls Fontanals, Agusti
    Cartes Galceran, Joan
    Lynd, Frances
    Sanz Latiesas, Xavier
    Rodriguez de Dios, Nuria
    Reig Castillejo, Anna
    Lacruz Bassols, Marti
    Lozano Galan, Joan
    Membrive Conejo, Ismael
    Agara Lopez, Manuel
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (02) : 150 - 155
  • [5] Prospective randomised multicenter trial on single fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy X 1) versus multiple fractions (3 Gy X 10) in the treatment of painful bone metastases
    Kaasa, Stein
    Brenne, Elisabeth
    Lund, Jo-Asmund
    Fayers, Peter
    Falkmer, Ursula
    Holmberg, Matts
    Lagerlund, Magnus
    Bruland, Oivind
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 79 (03) : 278 - 284
  • [6] Long-term survival in patients with NSCLC treated with single fraction vs multi-fraction palliative radiotherapy in the case of lung tumor, brain metastases, and bone metastases.
    Szablewska, Sylwia
    Adamczak-Sobczak, Magdalena
    Roszkowska, Zofia
    Roszkowski, Krzysztof
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [7] 8 Gy single fraction radiotherapy provides equal palliation in long term surviving patients with painful bone metastases compared to multiple fractions: results from the randomised Dutch Bone Metastasis Study
    van der Linden, Y
    Steenland, E
    van Houwelingen, J
    Oei, S
    Marijnen, C
    Leer, J
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S208 - S209