Probability of second live birth after first natural and medically assisted reproduction-mediated live birth: A historical cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Esposito, Giovanna [1 ]
Parazzini, Fabio [1 ]
Vigano, Paola [2 ]
Franchi, Matteo [3 ,4 ]
Cipriani, Sonia [5 ]
Fedele, Francesco [1 ]
Corrao, Giovanni [3 ,4 ]
Somigliana, Edgardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Infertil Unit, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Stat & Quantitat Methods, Unit Biostat Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Milan, Italy
[4] Natl Ctr Healthcare Res & Pharmacoepidemiol, Milan, Italy
[5] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Dept Woman Newborn & Child, Milan, Italy
关键词
desired number of children; family rate; medically assisted reproduction; second birth; SPONTANEOUS CONCEPTION; SPONTANEOUS PREGNANCY; INFERTILITY; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14685
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionEvidence on the role of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) in achieving the desired number of children is very limited. The aim of the current investigation was to assess the probability and the mode of conception of a second live birth according to the mode of conception of the first one.Material and methodsThis historical cohort study was based on administrative data from regional healthcare databases. Women hospitalized for childbirth in Lombardy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017 were identified. The probability of a second live birth up to 2021 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We calculated this probability according to the mode of conception of the first birth, and the analysis was also performed in strata of maternal age at first birth. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the association between mode of conception at first live birth and the probability of having a second live birth. Mothers were right-censored if they moved out of the region, died, or did not have a second live birth by the end of follow-up.ResultsWe identified 431 333 women who had their first live birth after a natural conception and 16 837 who had their first live birth after MAR. The probability of having a second live birth was 58.6% and 32.1%, respectively in the two groups (HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.66-0.70). Considering solely women who naturally conceived their first live birth, the probability to have a second child with MAR was 1.1% and to have a second child naturally 59.3%. The corresponding values were 11.5% and 25.2% in the group of women with a first MAR-mediated live birth.ConclusionsIn our cohort, one woman out of 10 having a first MAR-mediated live birth underwent MAR programs again. Considering women who had a first natural live birth, this proportion was drastically reduced. In the field of MAR, more attention should be given to the capacity of a couple to achieve the number of desired children. Poor attention has been given to the contribution of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) to the desired family size. One woman out of 10 having a first live birth after MAR had a second baby by this way and only one in a hundred if one considers women with a first naturally conceived birth.image
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The chance of a live birth after assisted reproduction in women with thyroid disorders
    Jolving, Line Riis
    Larsen, Michael Due
    Fedder, Jens
    Friedman, Sonia
    Norgard, Bente Mertz
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 11 : 683 - 694
  • [2] Cumulative Live Birth Rates for Women returning to assisted reproduction for a second Child
    Sonntag, Barbara
    GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE, 2020, 18 (03): : 175 - 176
  • [3] Live Birth and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Women With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Assisted Reproduction - A 20 Year Nationwide Cohort Study
    Norgard, Bente M.
    Larsen, Pia V.
    Fedder, Jens
    de Silva, Punyanganie S.
    Friedman, Sonia
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S93 - S93
  • [4] Substantial Weight Gain in Adulthood Is Associated with Lower Probability of Live Birth Following Assisted Reproduction
    Gaskins, Audrey J.
    Arvizu, Mariel
    Minguez-Alarcon, Lidia
    Dadd, Ramace
    Souter, Irene
    Chavarro, Jorge E.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2021, 151 (03): : 649 - 656
  • [5] Live birth in women with multiple sclerosis receiving assisted reproduction
    Jolving, Line Riis
    Larsen, Michael Due
    Fedder, Jens
    Norgard, Bente Mertz
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 40 (05) : 711 - 718
  • [6] Live Birth and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Women With Crohn's Disease Receiving Assisted Reproduction - A 20 Year Nationwide Cohort Study
    Friedman, Sonia
    Larsen, Pia V.
    Fedder, Jens
    de Silva, Punyanganie S.
    Larsen, Michael D.
    Norgard, Bente M.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S20 - S20
  • [7] First live birth after uterine transposition
    Ribeiro, Reitan
    Anselmi, Maria Cristina
    Schneider, Gunther Alex
    Furtado, Jose Pio Rodrigues
    Shwareb, Mohamed Gaber Mohamed Abau
    Linhares, Jose Clemente
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (01) : 188 - 193
  • [8] Predictors of live birth in women with a history of biochemical pregnancies after assisted reproduction treatment
    Tarin, Juan J.
    Pascual, Eva
    Gomez, Raul
    Garcia-Perez, Miguel A.
    Cano, Antonio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 248 : 198 - 203
  • [9] Live birth after robotic-assisted live donor uterus transplantation
    Brannstrom, Mats
    Dahm-Kahler, Pernilla
    Kvarnstrom, Niclas
    Akouri, Randa
    Rova, Karin
    Olausson, Michael
    Groth, Klaus
    Ekberg, Jana
    Enskog, Anders
    Sheikhi, Mona
    Molne, Johan
    Bokstrom, Hans
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (09) : 1222 - 1229
  • [10] Cumulative live birth rates following assisted reproduction: the younger, the better?
    Chetkowski, Ryszard J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (03) : e21 - e21