A comparative analysis of weight-based machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Ha Giang area

被引:22
|
作者
Thanh Trinh [1 ,2 ]
Binh Thanh Luu [3 ]
Trang Ha Thi Le [4 ]
Duong Huy Nguyen [5 ]
Trong Van Tran [5 ]
Thi Hai Van Nguyen [5 ]
Khanh Quoc Nguyen [5 ]
Lien Thi Nguyen [5 ]
机构
[1] Phenikaa Univ, Fac Comp Sci, Hanoi 12116, Vietnam
[2] Phenikaa Res & Technol Inst PRATI, A&A Green Phoenix Grp JSC, 167 Hoang Ngan, Hanoi 11313, Vietnam
[3] Gen Dept Geol & Minerals Vietnam, Northwestern Geol Div, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Thuyloi Univ, Youth Union Off, 175 Tay Son, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Vietnam Inst Geosci & Mineral Resources, Ctr Remote Sensing & Geohazards, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Landslide; logistic regression; random forest; SVM; Vietnam; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; HYBRID INTEGRATION; DECISION-TREE; GIS; PREDICTION; BIVARIATE; MULTIVARIATE; MOUNTAINS; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.1080/20964471.2022.2043520
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) are very crucial for planning policies in hazardous areas. However, the accuracy and reliability of LSMs depend on available data and the selection of suitable methods. This study is conducted to produce LSMs by combinations of machine learning methods and weighting techniques for Ha Giang province, Vietnam, where has limited data. In study area, we gather 11 landslide conditioning factors and establish a landslide inventory map. Computing the weights of classes (or factors) is very important to prepare data for machine learning methods to generate LSMs. We first use frequency ratio (FR) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques to generate the weights. Then, random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and AHP methods are combined with FR and AHP weights to yield accurate and reliable LSMs. Finally, the performance of these methods is evaluated by five statistical metrics, ROC and R-index. The empirical results have shown that RF is the best method in terms of R-index and the five metrics, i.e. TP rate (0.9661), FP rate (0.0), ACC (0.9835), MAE (0.0046), and RMSE (0.0350) for this study area. This study opens the perspective of weight-based machine learning methods for landslide susceptibility mapping.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1034
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative evaluation of landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning-based methods in Bogor area of Indonesia
    Dian Nuraini Melati
    Raditya Panji Umbara
    Astisiasari Astisiasari
    Wisyanto Wisyanto
    Syakira Trisnafiah
    Trinugroho Trinugroho
    Firman Prawiradisastra
    Yukni Arifianti
    Taufik Iqbal Ramdhani
    Samsul Arifin
    Maria Susan Anggreainy
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2024, 83
  • [2] A comparative evaluation of landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning-based methods in Bogor area of Indonesia
    Melati, Dian Nuraini
    Umbara, Raditya Panji
    Astisiasari, Astisiasari
    Wisyanto, Wisyanto
    Trisnafiah, Syakira
    Trinugroho, Trinugroho
    Prawiradisastra, Firman
    Arifianti, Yukni
    Ramdhani, Taufik Iqbal
    Arifin, Samsul
    Anggreainy, Maria Susan
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 83 (03)
  • [3] Comparative analysis of methods for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Irigaray, C
    Chacon, J
    Fernandez, T
    LANDSLIDES - PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND FIELD TRIP ON LANDSLIDES, 1996, : 373 - 384
  • [4] A comprehensive review of machine learning-based methods in landslide susceptibility mapping
    Liu, Songlin
    Wang, Luqi
    Zhang, Wengang
    He, Yuwei
    Pijush, Samui
    GEOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 58 (06) : 2283 - 2301
  • [5] Machine Learning Feature Selection Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Micheletti, Natan
    Foresti, Loris
    Robert, Sylvain
    Leuenberger, Michael
    Pedrazzini, Andrea
    Jaboyedoff, Michel
    Kanevski, Mikhail
    MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2014, 46 (01) : 33 - 57
  • [6] Machine Learning Feature Selection Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Natan Micheletti
    Loris Foresti
    Sylvain Robert
    Michael Leuenberger
    Andrea Pedrazzini
    Michel Jaboyedoff
    Mikhail Kanevski
    Mathematical Geosciences, 2014, 46 : 33 - 57
  • [7] A Comparative Analysis of Certainty Factor-Based Machine Learning Methods for Collapse and Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Wenchuan County, China
    Yuan, Xinyue
    Liu, Chao
    Nie, Ruihua
    Yang, Zhengli
    Li, Weile
    Dai, Xiaoai
    Cheng, Junying
    Zhang, Junmin
    Ma, Lei
    Fu, Xiao
    Tang, Min
    Xu, Yina
    Lu, Heng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (14)
  • [8] Comparative Study of Convolutional Neural Network and Conventional Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Liu, Rui
    Yang, Xin
    Xu, Chong
    Wei, Liangshuai
    Zeng, Xiangqiang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [9] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Mountainous Area Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Shahabi, Himan
    Ahmadi, Reza
    Alizadeh, Mohsen
    Hashim, Mazlan
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Wolf, Isabelle D.
    Ariffin, Effi Helmy
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [10] Assessing and mapping landslide susceptibility using different machine learning methods
    Orhan, Osman
    Bilgilioglu, Suleyman Sefa
    Kaya, Zehra
    Ozcan, Adem Kursat
    Bilgilioglu, Hacer
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (10) : 2795 - 2820