Label Distribution Learning for Automatic Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images of Prostate Cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Nishio, Mizuho [1 ,2 ]
Matsuo, Hidetoshi [1 ]
Kurata, Yasuhisa [2 ]
Sugiyama, Osamu [3 ]
Fujimoto, Koji [4 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med, 7-5-2 Kusunoki cho,Chuo ku, Kobe 6500017, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Nucl Med, Grad Sch Med, 54 Shogoin Kawahara cho,Sakyo ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[3] Kindai Univ, Dept Informat, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashiosaka City 5778502, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Real World Data Res & Dev, Grad Sch Med, 54 Shogoin Kawahara cho,Sakyo ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; Gleason score; ISUP score; digital pathology; deep learning; label distribution learning; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15051535
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic prediction system for grading histopathological images of prostate cancer using a deep learning model and label distribution learning. Our results show that the label distribution learning improved the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system for the cancer grading. We aimed to develop and evaluate an automatic prediction system for grading histopathological images of prostate cancer. A total of 10,616 whole slide images (WSIs) of prostate tissue were used in this study. The WSIs from one institution (5160 WSIs) were used as the development set, while those from the other institution (5456 WSIs) were used as the unseen test set. Label distribution learning (LDL) was used to address a difference in label characteristics between the development and test sets. A combination of EfficientNet (a deep learning model) and LDL was utilized to develop an automatic prediction system. Quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) and accuracy in the test set were used as the evaluation metrics. The QWK and accuracy were compared between systems with and without LDL to evaluate the usefulness of LDL in system development. The QWK and accuracy were 0.364 and 0.407 in the systems with LDL and 0.240 and 0.247 in those without LDL, respectively. Thus, LDL improved the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system for the grading of histopathological images for cancer. By handling the difference in label characteristics using LDL, the diagnostic performance of the automatic prediction system could be improved for prostate cancer grading.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automatic Breast Cancer Grading of Histopathological Images
    Dalle, Jean-Romain
    Leow, Wee Kheng
    Racoceanu, Daniel
    Tutac, Adina Eunice
    Putti, Thomas C.
    2008 30TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 3052 - +
  • [2] A Survey On Automatic Breast Cancer Grading Of Histopathological Images
    Amitha, H.
    Selvamani, I.
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, POWER, COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCPCCT), 2018, : 185 - 189
  • [3] Visually Meaningful Histopathological Features for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer
    Niazi, M. Khalid Khan
    Yao, Keluo
    Zynger, Debra L.
    Clinton, Steven K.
    Chen, James
    Koyuturk, Mehmet
    LaFramboise, Thomas
    Gurcan, Metin
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2017, 21 (04) : 1027 - 1038
  • [4] Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts
    Nir, Guy
    Hor, Soheil
    Karimi, Davood
    Fazli, Ladan
    Skinnider, Brian F.
    Tavassoli, Peyman
    Turbin, Dmitry
    Villamil, Carlos F.
    Wang, Gang
    Wilson, R. Storey
    Iczkowski, Kenneth A.
    Lucia, M. Scott
    Black, Peter C.
    Abolmaesumi, Purang
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Salcudean, Septimiu E.
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2018, 50 : 167 - 180
  • [5] Automatic diagnosis and grading of Prostate Cancer with weakly supervised learning on whole slide images
    Xiang, Jinxi
    Wang, Xiyue
    Wang, Xinran
    Zhang, Jun
    Yang, Sen
    Yang, Wei
    Han, Xiao
    Liu, Yueping
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 152
  • [6] Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using SLIM and machine learning
    Nguyen, Tan H.
    Sridharan, Shamira
    Marcias, Virgilia
    Balla, Andre K.
    Do, Minh N.
    Popescu, Gabriel
    QUANTITATIVE PHASE IMAGING II, 2016, 9718
  • [7] Automatic Mitosis and Nuclear Atypia Detection for Breast Cancer Grading in Histopathological Images using Hybrid Machine Learning Technique
    Maheshwari N.U.
    SatheesKumaran S.
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83 (42) : 90105 - 90132
  • [8] Analysis of the spatial distribution of prostate cancer obtained from histopathological images
    Diaz, Kristians
    Castaneda, Benjamin
    Luisa Montero, Maria
    Yao, Jorge
    Joseph, Jean
    Rubens, Deborah
    Parker, Kevin J.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: DIGITAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 8676
  • [9] First-Stage Prostate Cancer Identification on Histopathological Images: Hand-Driven versus Automatic Learning
    Garcia, Gabriel
    Colomer, Adrian
    Naranjo, Valery
    ENTROPY, 2019, 21 (04)
  • [10] A novel self-learning framework for bladder cancer grading using histopathological images
    Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia
    46022, Spain
    不详
    46026, Spain
    arXiv, 1600,