Investigating the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ecosystem services for regional spatial management

被引:54
|
作者
Yuan, Yuan [1 ,5 ]
Bai, Zhongke [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Zhang, Junjie [4 ,6 ]
Huang, Yuhan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Land Consolidat & Rehabil, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Nat Resources, Technol Innovat Ctr Ecol Restorat Engn Min Area, Beijing 100035, Peoples R China
[4] Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Res Inst, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[5] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Land Sci & Technol, 29 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[6] Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Res Inst, Guangzhou City 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Supply and demand assessment; Trade-offs; Spatial management; Changzhi City; LAND-USE; CARBON STORAGE; RIVER-BASIN; URBAN; LANDSCAPE; CAPACITY; INDICATORS; PATTERNS; CLIMATE; BUNDLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116591
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Understanding the supply and demand characteristics of ecosystem services (ESs) and their trade-offs is the basis for effective ecosystem management and the improvement of human well-being. However, current management practices based on the trade-offs between the supply and demand for ESs remain limited. This study aimed to integrate ES trade-offs into regional spatial management. With Changzhi, China, as the study area, this study evaluated the supply, demand, and trade-offs of food provision, water conservation, soil retention, and carbon sequestration by linking multi-source data and using spatial analysis tools, including the InVEST model, ArcGIS, and GeoDA. Based on the trade-offs and importance of different ecological functions, we constructed an urban spatial management framework and proposed recommendations for optimization in different management zones. The results showed that (1) the supply and demand for multiple ESs exhibited spatial heterogeneity. Except for water conservation, the supply of other ESs met the demand of the city, but there were still obvious deficits in some regions. (2) In terms of the ES supply, there were trade-offs between food production and other ESs, and synergies existed among water conservation, soil retention, and carbon sequestration. In terms of the ES demand, the four ESs exhibited synergistic relationships. In the cluster analysis, ES supply and demand were divided into four ES bundles, respectively. (3) The spatial mismatch of ESs in the sub-watersheds of the study area was obvious. The ESDR coldspots for the four ESs were primarily located in the urban built-up areas in the central and southern regions of the city. The ESDR hotspots of soil retention and carbon sequestration were mainly distributed in the eastern and northwestern regions of Changzhi, which are less urbanized. There were few ESDR hotspots for food production and water conservation. (4) Based on the regional spatial management framework, Changzhi was divided into ten zones, including extremely important, moderately important, important, sup-ply-demand risk management, soil erosion management, and high food production areas. The results and con-clusions of this study provide a basis for spatial planning and ecosystem management.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coupling management ecosystem service supply-supply trade-offs and supply-demand trade-offs: Framework and practice
    Su, Boru
    Liu, Moucheng
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166
  • [2] Coupling trade-offs and supply-demand of ecosystem services(ES): A new opportunity for ES management
    Qiang Feng
    Wenwu Zhao
    Baoling Duan
    Xiangping Hu
    Francesco Cherubini
    Geography and Sustainability, 2021, (04) : 275 - 280
  • [3] Coupling trade-offs and supply-demand of ecosystem services (ES): A new opportunity for ES management
    Feng, Qiang
    Zhao, Wenwu
    Duan, Baoling
    Hu, Xiangping
    Cherubini, Francesco
    GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 2 (04) : 275 - 280
  • [4] Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 145 - 146
  • [5] Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Qian
    Yang, Ying
    Yang, Ren
    Zha, Li-Si
    Lin, Zi-Qing
    Shang, Shu-Hao
    LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [6] Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region
    Briner, Simon
    Huber, Robert
    Bebi, Peter
    Elkin, Che
    Schmatz, Dirk R.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [7] Ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs informing the supply-demand match of ecosystem services: Framework and application
    Wang, Lijuan
    Zheng, Hua
    Wen, Zhi
    Liu, Lei
    Robinson, Brian E.
    Li, Ruonan
    Li, Cong
    Kong, Lingqiao
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 37
  • [8] Assessing synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest landscape management
    Jafarzadeh, Ali Akbar
    Mahdavi, Ali
    Shamsi, Seyed Rashid Fallah
    Yousefpour, Rasoul
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111
  • [9] Trade-offs between objectives for ecosystem management of fisheries
    Andersen, Ken H.
    Brander, Keith
    Ravn-Jonsen, Lars
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 25 (05) : 1390 - 1396
  • [10] Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services on the Tibetan Plateau
    Yuan, Zhengrong
    Liang, Yuling
    Zhao, Hui
    Wei, Da
    Wang, Xiaodan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 158