Development of a risk prediction tool for patients with locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer undergoing pelvic exenteration: protocol for a mixed-methods study

被引:4
|
作者
Brown, Kilian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Solomon, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ng, Kheng-Seong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Sutton, Paul [6 ,7 ]
Koh, Cherry [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
White, Kate [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Steffens, Daniel [2 ,4 ]
EviSurg Res Grp
机构
[1] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Surg Outcomes Res Ctr SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Inst Acad Surg IAS, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Cent Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Concord Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Colorectal & Peritoneal Oncol Ctr, Manchester, England
[7] Univ Manchester, Div Canc Sci, Manchester, England
[8] Univ Sydney, Sydney Nursing Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Sydney, Daffodil Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Canc Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
Colorectal surgery; Gastrointestinal tumours; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075304
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Pelvic exenteration (PE) surgery represents the only potentially curative treatment option for patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer (LARRC). Given the potential morbidity, whether or not PE should be recommended for an individual patient presents a major decisional conflict. This study aims to identify the outcomes of PE for which there is consensus among patients, carers and clinicians regarding their importance in guiding treatment decision-making, and to develop a risk prediction tool which predicts these outcomes.Methods and analysis This study will be conducted at a specialist PE centre, and employ a mixed-methods study design, divided into three distinct phases. In phase 1, outcomes of PE will be identified through a comprehensive systematic review of the literature (phase 1a), followed by exploration of the experiences of individuals who have undergone PE for LARRC and their carers (phase 1b, target sample size 10-20 patients and 5-10 carers). In phase 2, a survey of patients, their carers and clinicians will be conducted using Delphi methodology to explore consensus around the outcomes of highest priority and the level of influence each outcome should have on treatment decision-making. In phase 3 a, risk prediction tool will be developed using data from a single PE referral centre (estimated sample size 500 patients) to predict priority outcomes using multivariate modelling, and externally validated using data from an international PE collaboration.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted for phases 1 and 2 (X22-0422 and 2022/ETH02659) and for maintenance of the database used in phase 3 (X13-0283 and HREC/13/RPAH/504). Informed consent will be obtained from participants in phases 1b and 2; a waiver of consent for secondary use of data in phase 3 will be sought. Study results will be submitted for publication in international and/or national peer reviewed journals.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022351909.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PELVIC EXENTERATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED OR LOCALLY RECURRENT RECTAL CANCER
    Yano, H.
    Suda, R.
    Gohda, Y.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (05) : E334 - E335
  • [2] Pelvic exenteration for recurrent and locally advanced rectal cancer
    Hempen, Hans-Guenther
    Raab, Hans-Rudolf
    CHIRURGISCHE GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2007, 23 (04): : 332 - 339
  • [3] Pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer
    Ng, D.
    Koh, Y. X.
    Tan, G.
    Teo, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S542 - S542
  • [4] Total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer in the elderly
    Hagemans, J. A. W.
    Rothbarth, J.
    Kirkels, W. J.
    Boormans, J. L.
    van Meerten, E.
    Nuyttens, J. J. M. E.
    Madsen, E. V. E.
    Verhoef, C.
    Burger, J. W. A.
    EJSO, 2018, 44 (10): : 1548 - 1554
  • [5] Total pelvic exenteration for primary locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Vermaas, M.
    Ferenschild, F. T. J.
    Verhoef, C.
    Nuyttens, J. J. M. E.
    Marinelli, A. W. K. S.
    Wiggers, T.
    Kirkels, W. J.
    Eggermont, A. M. M.
    de Wilt, J. H. W.
    EJSO, 2007, 33 (04): : 452 - 458
  • [6] Total pelvic exenteration for primary locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
    M. Vermaas
    F. Ferenschild
    C. Verhoef
    J. Nuyttens
    T. Wiggers
    A. Marinelli
    A. Eggermont
    J. De Wilt
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2004, 11 (Suppl 2) : S108 - S108
  • [7] Total pelvic exenteration for primary locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
    Vermaas, M
    Ferenschild, FTJ
    Verhoef, C
    Nuyttens, JJME
    Marinelli, AWKS
    Wiggers, T
    Kirkels, WJ
    Eggermont, AMM
    de Wilt, JHW
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17
  • [8] Total pelvic exenteration for primary locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
    Vermaas, M
    Ferenschild, F
    Verhoef, C
    Nuyttens, J
    Wiggers, T
    Marinelli, A
    Eggermont, A
    De Wilt, J
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (02) : S108 - S108
  • [9] Outcomes of pelvic exenteration for recurrent and primary locally advanced rectal cancer
    Rottoli, Matteo
    Vallicelli, Carlo
    Boschi, Luca
    Poggioli, Gilberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 48 : 69 - 73
  • [10] What Constitutes a Clear Margin in Patients With Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration?
    Koh, Cherry E.
    Brown, Kilian G. M.
    Steffens, Daniel
    Young, Jane
    Salkeld, Glenn
    Solomon, Michael J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 275 (01) : 157 - 165