Cost-Utility Analysis for Colorectal Cancer Screening According to the Initiating Age of National Cancer Screening Program in Korea

被引:1
|
作者
Bae, Seowoo [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Kyeongmin [3 ]
Kim, Byung Chang [4 ]
Jun, Jae Kwan [1 ,3 ]
Choi, Kui Son [1 ,3 ]
Suh, Mina [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Control Inst, Natl Canc Ctr, Goyang, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Hlth Convergence, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Grad Sch Canc Sci & Policy, Goyang, South Korea
[4] Res Inst & Hosp, Ctr Colorectal Canc, Natl Canc Ctr, Goyang, South Korea
[5] Natl Canc Control Inst, Natl Canc Ctr, Western Tower 4,24 Jeongbalsan Ro, Goyang 10403, South Korea
关键词
Colorectal Cancer; Early Detection of Cancer; Economic Evaluation; FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS; METAANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; STRATEGIES; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e98
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to identify the most cost-effective strategy for colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), focusing on screening initiation age in Korea. Methods: We designed Markov simulation models targeting individuals aged 40 years or older. Twelve strategies combining screening initiation ages (40, 45, or 50 years old), termination ages (80 or no limit), and intervals (1 or 2 years) were modeled, and the most cost-effective strategy was selected. The robustness of the results was confirmed using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of the qualitative and quantitative FIT methods was verified using scenario analysis. Results: The 2 -year interval strategy with a screening age range of 45-80 years was the most cost-effective (incremental cost -utility ratio = KRW 7,281,646/quality adjusted life years). The most sensitive variables in the results were transition rate from advanced adenoma to local cancer and discount rate. The uncertainty in the model was substantially low. Moreover, strategies starting at the age of 40 years were also cost-effective but considered suboptimal. The scenario analysis showed that there was no significant difference in cost-effectiveness between strategies with various relative screening ratio of quantitative and qualitative method. Conclusion: The screening method for advancing the initiation age, as presented in the 2015 revised national screening recommendations, was superior regarding cost-effectiveness. This study provides a new paradigm for the development of a national cancer screening system in Korea, which can be utilized as a scientific basis for economic evaluations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea
    Baik, Seung Min
    Lee, Ryung-Ah
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2023, 105 (06) : 333 - 340
  • [2] Cost Utility Analysis of National Cancer Screening Program for Gastric Cancer in Korea: A Markov Model Analysis
    Bae, Seowoo
    Lee, Hyewon
    Her, Eun Young
    Lee, Kyeongmin
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Ahn, Jeonghoon
    Choi, Il Ju
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    Choi, Kui Son
    Suh, Mina
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2025, 40 (06)
  • [3] Cost-utility analysis of the National Health Screening Program for chronic kidney disease in Korea
    Go, Dun-Sol
    Kim, Seon-Ha
    Park, Jongha
    Ryu, Dong-Ryeol
    Lee, Hyeon-Jeong
    Jo, Min-Woo
    NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 24 (01) : 56 - 64
  • [4] Cost-utility analysis of expanding the colorectal cancer screening policy in Flanders
    Lelie, M.
    Parmentier, R.
    Simoens, S.
    Annemans, L.
    Putman, K.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 231 : 142 - 147
  • [5] Results of Colorectal Cancer Screening of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea, 2008
    Shim, Jung Im
    Kim, Yeonju
    Han, Mi Ah
    Lee, Hoo-Yeon
    Choi, Kui Sun
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    Park, Eun-Cheol
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2010, 42 (04): : 191 - 198
  • [6] Should Colorectal Cancer Screening in Portugal Start at the Age of 45 Years? A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Currais, Pedro
    de Ferro, Susana Mao
    Areia, Miguel
    Marques, Ines
    Mayer, Alexandra
    Pereira, Antonio Dias
    GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 28 (05) : 311 - 318
  • [7] A Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in Australia
    Keller, Andrew
    Gericke, Christian
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Yaxley, John
    Kua, Boon
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 15 (01) : 95 - 111
  • [8] Cost-utility analysis of the screening program for early oral cancer detection in Thailand
    Kumdee, Chutima
    Kulpeng, Wantanee
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (11):
  • [9] A Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in Australia
    Andrew Keller
    Christian Gericke
    Jennifer A. Whitty
    John Yaxley
    Boon Kua
    Geoff Coughlin
    Troy Gianduzzo
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2017, 15 : 95 - 111
  • [10] Patients' Preferences for Primary Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Survey of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea
    Cho, Young-Hak
    Kim, Dae Ho
    Cha, Jae Myung
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Moon, Jeong Seop
    Kim, Jin-Oh
    Lee, Sang Kil
    Cho, Yu Kyung
    Im, Jong Pil
    Jang, Jae Young
    Shin, Jeong Eun
    Yoon, Soon Man
    Jung, Yunho
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Lee, Kang Nyeong
    Cho, Soo-Jeong
    Kim, Yeol
    Park, Bo Young
    GUT AND LIVER, 2017, 11 (06) : 821 - 827