共 8 条
Navigating concepts of social-ecological resilience in marine fisheries under climate change: shared challenges and recommendations from the northeast United States
被引:2
|作者:
Maltby, K. M.
[1
]
Mason, J. G.
[2
]
Cheng, H.
[3
]
Fay, G.
[4
]
Selden, R. L.
[5
]
Williams, L.
[6
]
Alves, C. L.
[7
]
机构:
[1] Gulf Maine Res Inst, 350 Commercial St, Portland, ME 04101 USA
[2] Environm Def Fund, 18 Tremont St, Boston, MA 02108 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Dept Marine & Environm Sci, Marine Sci Ctr, 430 Nahant Rd, Nahant, MA 01908 USA
[4] Univ Massachusetts Dartmouth, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, 836 S Rodney French Blvd, New Bedford, MA 02744 USA
[5] Wellesley Coll, Dept Biol Sci, 106 Cent St, Wellesley, MA 02481 USA
[6] Univ New Hampshire, New Hampshire Sea Grant, 8 Coll Rd, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[7] Save Bay, 100 Save Bay Dr, Providence, RI 02905 USA
关键词:
adaptation;
fishery;
resilient;
social-ecological system;
vulnerability;
FISHING COMMUNITIES;
STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION;
MANAGEMENT;
ADAPTATION;
KNOWLEDGE;
SHIFTS;
RISK;
VULNERABILITY;
PERCEPTIONS;
INDICATORS;
D O I:
10.1093/icesjms/fsad151
中图分类号:
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号:
0908 ;
摘要:
Climate change is increasingly impacting marine fisheries worldwide. Concurrently, scientific interest has grown to understand how these systems can cope and adapt, with research shifting from examining vulnerability to assessing risks to focusing on determining and operationalizing resilience. As fisheries-climate-resilience researchers and practitioners navigating a sea of frameworks, toolkits, strategies, policy goals, and management desires, we take stock to ask: what does resilience mean to us? Drawing on our experiences in the northeast United States, we discuss the challenges and ambiguity we encounter in concepts of social-ecological resilience and explore implications for research and implementation. We bring together perspectives to discuss various approaches to resilience, highlighting shared and unique challenges we face. We outline three key considerations as we move forward in resilience research and practice: (1) the need for greater transparency and reflexivity among researchers regarding how they frame and approach resilience; (2) the value of increasing coordination and communication among fisheries groups working on these topics; and (3) the use of co-developed and co-produced resilience research and strategies. We urge for greater centring of communities in these discussions and to explicitly consider how resilience interacts with equity outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2266 / 2279
页数:14
相关论文