The efficacy of the Self-Administered Interview in minimising the misinformation effect

被引:0
|
作者
Bird, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Wiener, Jan [1 ]
Attard-Johnson, Janice [1 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Psychol, Poole, Dorset, England
[2] Bournemouth Univ, Fern Barrow Rd, Poole BH12 5BB, Dorset, England
关键词
eyewitness memory; eyewitness testimony; investigative interviewing; misinformation effect; Self-Administered Interview; MISLEADING POSTEVENT INFORMATION; EYEWITNESS MEMORY; RECALL; EVENTS; SUGGESTIBILITY; WITNESSES; POWER;
D O I
10.1002/acp.4179
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two experiments investigated the efficacy of the Self-Administered Interview (SAI) in immediate recall and minimising misinformation into later recall. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 114) viewed a reconstructed crime video and completed the SAI, Written Free Recall (WFR), or no recall for immediate recall, followed by a Delayed Recall questionnaire 1-to-2 weeks later. Experiment 2 replicated the procedure, except after the delay, participants (N = 141) were exposed to misinformation before Delayed Recall. Across both experiments, the SAI enhanced immediate memory, particularly for person details, compared to WFR. However, this initial enhancement did not lead to more correct information after the delay, although it reduced incorrect responses compared to no immediate recall. Surprisingly, neither the SAI nor the WFR reduced susceptibility to misinformation. The findings suggest completing an SAI immediately or soon after witnessing an event could enhance memory recall, reinforcing its potential utility for witnesses.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy of the Self-Administered Interview: A systematic review
    Bird, Emily
    Wiener, Jan
    Huang, Ching-Yu
    Attard-Johnson, Janice
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND OFFENDER PROFILING, 2024, 21 (03)
  • [2] Examining the efficacy of a digital version of the Self-Administered Interview
    Gabbert, Fiona
    Hope, Lorraine
    Horry, Ruth
    Drain, Tyler
    Hughes, Chelsea
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2022, 5
  • [3] Investigating the Impact of Delayed Administration on the Efficacy of the Self-Administered Interview
    Paterson, Helen M.
    Eijkemans, Hester
    Kemp, Richard I.
    PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2015, 22 (02) : 307 - 317
  • [4] Protecting Eyewitness Evidence: Examining the Efficacy of a Self-Administered Interview Tool
    Gabbert, Fiona
    Hope, Lorraine
    Fisher, Ronald P.
    LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2009, 33 (04) : 298 - 307
  • [5] A tip to resolve the language barriers for interview: Introducing "the Self-Administered Interview"
    Matsuo, Kayo
    Miura, Hiroshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 601 - 601
  • [6] A COMPARISON OF A SELF-ADMINISTERED DIETARY QUESTIONNAIRE AND A SHORT INTERVIEW
    KARINPAA, A
    SEPPANEN, R
    NUTRITION RESEARCH, 1983, 3 (03) : 285 - 291
  • [7] The effect of response modality on witness statements when using the self-administered interview
    Gomes, Joao P.
    Fernandes, Delfina
    Paulo, Rui M.
    Albuquerque, Pedro B.
    PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2024,
  • [8] The efficacy assessment of a self-administered immunotherapy protocol
    Schaffer, Frederick M.
    Garner, Larry M.
    Ebeling, Myla
    Adelglass, Jeffrey M.
    Hulsey, Thomas C.
    Naples, Andrew R.
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2016, 6 (02) : 148 - 155
  • [9] Efficacy of self-administered treatments for depression and anxiety
    Menchola, Marisa
    Arkowitz, Hal S.
    Burke, Brian L.
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2007, 38 (04) : 421 - 429
  • [10] Interview administered versus self-administered PROQOL-HIV scale in India
    Kohli, Rewa Malhotra
    Lalanne, Christophe
    Paranjape, Ramesh S.
    Nirmalkar, Amit
    Ghate, Manisha
    Herrmann, Susan
    Chassany, Olivier
    Duracinsky, Martin
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 : 84 - 85