Clinical learning evaluation questionnaire: a reliable and valid tool for the evaluation of clinical education by educators and students

被引:0
|
作者
Ostovarfar, Jeyran [1 ]
Soufi, Saeed Kazemi [2 ]
Moosavi, Mahsa [3 ]
Delavari, Somayeh [4 ]
Moghadami, Mana [3 ]
Ghazanfari, Seyed Mehdi [3 ]
Amini, Mitra [3 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Med Sch, MPH Dept, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Clin Educ Res Ctr, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Ctr Educ Res Med Sci CERMS, Sch Med, Dept Med Educ, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Reliability; Validity; Clinical learning; Medical students; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENT; QUALITY; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-023-04601-w
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background The clinical learning evaluation questionnaire can be used in the clinical trial period of medical students to measure the effectiveness of the clinical learning environment. The purpose of this study was to collect validity evidence of an adapted questionnaire to measure the transcultural adaptation of a Persian version of CLEQ.Methods A total of 200 questionnaires were completed by students who were at the end of their clinical rotation. The study instrument was the latest version of the CLEQ consists of 18 Items in four dimensions. The CLEQ was translated into Persian language through a four-step process of forward and backward translation. Data analysis was performed on two softwares, SPSS, version 22 and Lisrel, version 8.8.Results The results showed that the 18-question CLEQ could be applied to the Persian translation of the tool. The response process evidence of the Persian questionnaire was established through feedback from 15 students in the sample group. The content validity index (CVI) for the items were between 0.8 and 0.9, and the content validity ratio (CVR) for the entire questionnaire was 0.9. The 4-factor feature of CLEQ was good model fit. The internal consistency analysis indicated that the Cronbach's alpha values for all items of the 18-item questionnaire were equal to 0.87 and for the subscales were 0.68 to 0.79.Conclusion The Persian translation of the 4-factor CLEQ has sufficient validity evidence to measure the transcultural adaptability of clinical education activities by instructors and students. The validity evidence are content, response process and internal structure. We recommend that the English 6-factor and 6-factor versions of CLEQ be tested on medical students at multiple foreign academic institutions to assess their efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical learning evaluation questionnaire: a reliable and valid tool for the evaluation of clinical education by educators and students
    Jeyran Ostovarfar
    Saeed Kazemi Soufi
    Mahsa Moosavi
    Somayeh Delavari
    Mana Moghadami
    Seyed Mehdi Ghazanfari
    Mitra Amini
    BMC Medical Education, 23
  • [2] The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a Valid and Reliable Instrument for the Evaluation of Clinical Teachers
    Stalmeijer, Renee E.
    Dolmans, Diana H. J. M.
    Wolfhagen, Ineke H. A. P.
    Muijtjens, Arno M. M.
    Scherpbier, Albert J. J. A.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2010, 85 (11) : 1732 - 1738
  • [3] FACULTY PERSPECTIVES OF A VALID AND RELIABLE CLINICAL TUTOR EVALUATION PROGRAM
    MCLEOD, PJ
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1991, 14 (03) : 333 - 342
  • [4] Scan of the postgraduate educational environment domains questionnaire: a reliable and valid tool for the evaluation of educational environment in postgraduate medical education
    Seyedhassan, Sadrian
    Mahsa, Moosavi
    Jeyran, Ostovarfar
    Mitra, Amini
    Rezvan, Ghaderpanah
    Sedigheh, Mokhtarpour
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Development of the clinical learning evaluation questionnaire for undergraduate clinical education: factor structure, validity, and reliability study
    AlHaqwi, Ali I.
    Kuntze, Jeroen
    van der Molen, Henk T.
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 14
  • [6] Development of the clinical learning evaluation questionnaire for undergraduate clinical education: factor structure, validity, and reliability study
    Ali I AlHaqwi
    Jeroen Kuntze
    Henk T van der Molen
    BMC Medical Education, 14
  • [7] LEARNING CONTRACTS IN CLINICAL EDUCATION - EVALUATION BY CLINICAL SUPERVISORS
    SOLOMON, P
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 1992, 14 (2-3) : 205 - 210
  • [8] The patient engagement evaluation tool was valid for clinical practice guideline development
    Moore, Ainsley
    Wu, Yin
    Kwakkenbos, Linda
    Silveira, Kyle
    Straus, Sharon
    Brouwers, Melissa
    Grad, Roland
    Thombs, Brett D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 143 : 61 - 72
  • [9] Clinical Learning Evaluation Questionnaire: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis
    Alnaami, Nuha
    Al Haqwi, Ali
    Masuadi, Emad
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2020, 11 : 953 - 961
  • [10] An Antipodean evaluation of problem-based learning by clinical educators
    Williams, AF
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 1999, 19 (08) : 659 - 667