BackgroundPatients with homozygous sickle cell disease (HbSS) and clinical splenomegaly by 6 months of age appeared at greater risk of invasive infections after 5 years of the Jamaican Cohort Study. We determined whether this risk remained significant over a longer study period, using a more rigorous definition of infection and examining the contribution of potential confounders. MethodsNewborn screening of 100,000 consecutive deliveries during 1973-1981 detected 311 births with HbSS. Age at first clinical splenomegaly was used to categorize 285 of these patients in whom this could be determined: at or before 7 months (early), after 7 months (later), or 'never' palpated despite repeated examinations. Infective episodes were confined to 'first infections confirmed by positive culture'. Using a generalized linear model, the risk of septicaemia was assessed in each group, after adjusting for potential confounders. ResultsOf 93 'first infections', 42 occurred in 105 subjects in the 'early' group, 49 in 157 subjects in the 'later' group, and two in 23 subjects in the 'never' group; the observed to expected ratio of 1.42, 0.90 and 0.22 was highly significant (p = .003). Assessed as risk ratios, 'early' splenomegaly had a significantly higher risk ratio (RR) for septicaemia (RR = 7.4, confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-50.7, p < .05) when compared to the 'never' group adjusting for vaccine exposure and foetal haemoglobin concentration. The most common organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Salmonella species, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus. ConclusionEarly clinical splenomegaly in HbSS remains a predictor of septicaemia, defining a group that may require closer monitoring.