Should we be screening for COPD? - looking through the lens of lung cancer screening

被引:1
|
作者
Young, Robert P. [1 ,2 ]
Scott, Raewyn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Resp Res Grp, Auckland 1344, New Zealand
关键词
Spirometry; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; lung cancer screening; airflow limitation; chronic bronchitis; mortality; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; RATIO IMPAIRED SPIROMETRY; CHRONIC-BRONCHITIS; MUCIN MUC5AC; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; INDIVIDUALS; TRIAL; COMORBIDITIES; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1080/17476348.2023.2259800
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionIn May 2022, the US Preventive Services Task Force published their recommendation against screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in asymptomatic adults. However, we argue the routine use of spirometry in both asymptomatic and symptomatic high-risk smokers has utility.Areas coveredWe provide published and unpublished observations from a secondary analyses of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN), arm of the National Lung Screening Trial, including 18,463 high-risk current or former smokers who underwent pre-bronchodilator spirometry at baseline. According to history alone, 20% reported a prior diagnosis of 'COPD,' although only 11% (about one half), actually had airflow limitation (Diagnosed COPD) and 9% had Global Initiative for Obstructive Pulmonary Disease GOLD 0 Pre-COPD. Of the remaining 80% of 'asymptomatic' screening participants, 23% had airflow limitation (Screen-detected COPD) and 13% had preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm). This means 45% of this high-risk cohort were reclassified by spirometry, and together with comorbid disease, identified subgroups where lung cancer screening efficacy could be optimized by between 2-6 fold.Expert opinionOur preliminary findings suggest lung cancer screening outcomes vary according to 'new' COPD-related spirometric-defined subgroups and that screening spirometry, together with comorbid disease, identifies those for whom lung cancer screening is mostly beneficial or potentially harmful.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 771
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Should we be screening for colorectal cancer?
    Robinson, MHE
    Hardcastle, JD
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 54 (04) : 807 - 821
  • [2] Computed tomography screening for lung cancer -: What should we recommend?
    Byers, T
    Hirsch, FR
    CANCER PRACTICE, 2001, 9 (02) : 97 - 99
  • [3] Lung cancer screening: Should we be excluding people with previous malignancy?
    Cherie P Erkmen
    Larry R Kaiser
    Ashley L Ehret
    World Journal of Respirology, 2016, 6 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [4] Lung Cancer Screening, Emphysema, and COPD
    Mascalchi, Mario
    Luconi, Michaela
    CHEST, 2021, 159 (05) : 1699 - 1700
  • [5] Should screening for lung cancer be revisited?
    Deslauriers, J
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 121 (06): : 1031 - 1032
  • [6] Lung function impairment in lung cancer screening: discordance between risk and screening outcomes when looking through a PRISm
    Young, Robert P.
    Scott, Raewyn J.
    Gamble, Greg D.
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (10) : 1988 - 1994
  • [7] Lung function impairment in lung cancer screening: discordance between risk and screening outcomes when looking through a PRISm
    Young, Robert P.
    Scott, Raewyn J.
    Gamble, Greg D.
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2022,
  • [8] SCREENING Cervical cancer-should we abandon cytology for screening?
    Meijer, Chris J. L. M.
    Berkhof, Johannes
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 9 (10) : 558 - 559
  • [9] Should we individualize breast cancer screening?
    Desreux, J.
    Bleret, V.
    Lifrange, E.
    MATURITAS, 2012, 73 (03) : 202 - 205
  • [10] Lung cancer screening - are we there yet?
    Warner, Eiran
    Jotkowitz, Alan
    Maimon, Nimrod
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 21 (01) : 6 - 11