What women want now!

被引:2
|
作者
Shah, Geetika S. [1 ]
Phillips, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hosp, NHS Fdn Trust, Aldermaston Rd, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, England
关键词
Incontinence; Urogynaecology; Stress urinary incontinence; Cystocele; Uterine prolapse;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Importance: Stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are common conditions affecting women with many different conservative and surgical treatment options available for women. Objectives: Our primary aim was to determine patient views and preferences surrounding theoretical potential future treatment options for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD): pelvic organ prolapse/SUI and determine what level of success patients would find acceptable and see if their choice was dependent on severity of their symptoms. All patients had either just completed or were about to start a course of 3 months physiotherapy. All patients with overactive bladder symptoms were excluded. Study design: We conducted an service evaluation study of 100 consecutive women attending our urogynaecology clinic. Patients attending clinic completed a questionnaire. They were asked to choose a preferred treatment between "Option A": A surgical procedure which had an 80% success rate in curing symptoms but would require 1-2 day hospital stay and carry a small risk of complications. Or "Option B": A hypothetical course of outpatient, non-surgical treatments which would have a variable chance of improving (but not curing) symptoms (ranging from 70%, 50% or 25% chance of improvement) but would require no "down-time" and have no long term safety issues. Results: Our results showed 100% of women with severe PFD would chose a surgical procedure. However those with mild/moderate symptoms would prefer a non-surgical treatment (if one were available) which may only improve their symptoms but had no long-term complications. There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.46) between severity of symptoms and chance of success. Conclusions: This study is important as it highlights a change in patient demand from one of highest efficacy to possibly one with the greatest safety profile and quickest recovery time. Newer treatment technologies such as energy-based devices (radiofrequency, laser and magnetic therapy) have shown to have lower success rates but may be favourable for some women. This supports the need for further research in these areas.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 120
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WHAT DO THE FEDS WANT NOW
    BILGER, T
    PEPIN, A
    BLACKBURN, J
    COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY, 1981, 56 (04): : 389 - 390
  • [2] What Do You Want Now?
    Mirriam-Goldberg, Caryn
    MIDWEST QUARTERLY-A JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY THOUGHT, 2023, 64 (03): : 284 - 284
  • [3] LOOK WHAT THE UNIONS WANT NOW
    NULTY, P
    FORTUNE, 1993, 127 (03) : 128 - &
  • [4] What women want
    Watkins, D
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2002, 174 (2341) : 60 - 61
  • [5] WHAT WOMEN WANT
    KNOLL, JL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 146 (10): : 1362 - 1362
  • [6] What women want
    Oppong, Grace
    Engineering and Technology, 2010, 5 (13): : 16 - 17
  • [7] What women want
    Martindale, D
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2001, 169 (2282) : 28 - 33
  • [8] What women want
    Brown, E
    FORBES, 2001, 168 (12): : 124 - 124
  • [9] What Women Want
    McIntyre, Karen
    Nonwovens Industry, 2023, 54 (09):
  • [10] WHAT WOMEN WANT
    BERGER, B
    COMMENTARY, 1979, 67 (03) : 62 - 66