Analysis of a Diffusion LMS Algorithm with Probing Delays for Cyclostationary White Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Inputs

被引:1
|
作者
Eweda, Eweda [1 ]
Bermudez, Jose C. M. [2 ]
Bershad, Neil J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Future Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Elect Engn, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Irvine, CA 92660 USA
关键词
Adaptive filters; Analysis; LMS algorithm; Stochastic diffusion algorithms; RECURSIVE LEAST-SQUARES; STOCHASTIC-ANALYSIS; COMMUNICATION DELAYS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; NLMS ALGORITHMS; MEAN SQUARES; STRATEGIES; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.sigpro.2024.109428
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The paper studies the behavior of the diffusion least mean square (DLMS) algorithm in the presence of delays in probing the unknown system by the nodes. The types of input distribution and the probing delays can be different for different nodes. The analysis is done for a network having a central combiner. This structure reduces the dimensionality of the resulting stochastic models while preserving important diffusion properties. Communication delays between the nodes and the central combiner are also considered in the analysis. The analysis is done for system identification for cyclostationary white nodal inputs. Mean and mean -square behaviors of the algorithm are analyzed. The derived models consist of simple scalar recursions. These recursions facilitate the understanding of the algorithm mean and mean -square dependence upon the 1) nodal input kurtosis, 2) nodal probing delays, 3) communication delays between the nodes and the central combiner, 4) nodal noise powers, and 5) nodal weighting coefficients. Significant differences are found between the algorithm behavior for equal probing delays and that for unequal probing delays. Results for unequal probing delays are surprising. Simulations are in excellent agreement with the theory.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance Analysis of Diffusion LMS for Cyclostationary White Non-Gaussian Inputs
    Gao, Wei
    Chen, Jie
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 91243 - 91252
  • [2] Analysis of a Diffusion LMS Algorithm With Communication Delays for Cyclostationary White Gaussian Inputs
    Eweda, Eweda
    Bermudez, Jose C. M.
    Bershad, Neil J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING OVER NETWORKS, 2022, 8 : 960 - 972
  • [3] Stochastic analysis of the LMS algorithm for cyclostationary colored Gaussian and non-Gaussian inputs
    Bershad, Neil J.
    Eweda, Eweda
    Bermudez, Jose C. M.
    DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 88 : 149 - 159
  • [4] Stochastic Analysis of the LMS and NLMS Algorithms for Cyclostationary White Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Inputs
    Eweda, Eweda
    Bershad, Neil J.
    Bermudez, Jose Carlos M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2018, 66 (18) : 4753 - 4765
  • [5] Stochastic analysis of the diffusion LMS algorithm for cyclostationary white Gaussian inputs
    Bershad, Neil J.
    Eweda, Eweda
    Bermudez, Jose C. M.
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 185
  • [6] Performance of soft limiters in the LMS algorithm for cyclostationary white Gaussian inputs
    Bershad, Neil J.
    Eweda, Eweda
    Bermudez, Jose C. M.
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2018, 152 : 197 - 205
  • [7] Stochastic analysis of the LMS algorithm for cyclostationary colored Gaussian inputs
    Bermudez, Jose C. M.
    Bershad, Neil J.
    Eweda, Eweda
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 160 : 127 - 136
  • [8] Diffusion Signed LMS Algorithms and Their Performance Analyses for Cyclostationary White Gaussian Inputs
    Wang, Wenyuan
    Zhao, Haiquan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2017, 5 : 18876 - 18894
  • [9] Stochastic Analysis of the LMS and NLMS Algorithms for Cyclostationary White Gaussian Inputs
    Bershad, Neil J.
    Eweda, Eweda
    Bermudez, Jose C. M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2014, 62 (09) : 2238 - 2249
  • [10] Stochastic Analysis of the Signed LMS Algorithms for Cyclostationary White Gaussian Inputs
    Eweda, Eweda
    Bershad, Neil J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 65 (07) : 1673 - 1684