Whole genome sequencing vs chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis

被引:10
|
作者
Hu, Ping [1 ]
Zhang, Qinxin [1 ]
Cheng, Qing [1 ]
Luo, Chunyu [1 ]
Zhang, Cuiping [1 ]
Zhou, Ran [1 ]
Meng, Lulu [1 ]
Huang, Mingtao [1 ]
Wang, Yuguo [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Qiao, Fengchang [1 ]
Xu, Zhengfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing Matern & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Dept Prenatal Diag, Womens Hosp, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
chromosomal microarray analysis; exonic deletion; fetal structural anomalies; prenatal diagnosis; trinucleotide repeat expansion; whole genome sequencing; JOINT CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATION; MEDICAL GENETICS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; COL4A2; MUTATIONS; ILL INFANTS; VARIANTS; STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Emerging studies suggest that whole genome sequencing provides additional diagnostic yield of genomic variants when compared with chromosomal microarray analysis in the etiologic diagnosis of infants and children with suspected genetic diseases. However, the application and evaluation of whole genome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis remain limited.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy, efficacy, and incremental yield of whole genome sequencing in comparison with chromosomal microarray analysis for routine prenatal diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study, a total of 185 unselected singleton fetuses with ultrasound-detected structural anomalies were enrolled. In parallel, each sample was subjected to whole genome sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis. Aneuploidies and copy number variations were detected and analyzed in a blinded fashion. Single nucleotide variations and insertions and deletions were confirmed by Sanger sequencing, and trinucleotide repeats expansion variants were verified using polymerase chain reaction plus fragment-length analysis.RESULTS: Overall, genetic diagnoses using whole genome sequencing were obtained for 28 (15.1%) cases. Whole genome sequencing not only detected all these aneuploidies and copy number variations in the 20 (10.8%) diagnosed cases identified by chromosomal microarray analysis, but also detected 1 case with an exonic deletion of COL4A2 and 7 (3.8%) cases with single nucleotide variations or insertions and deletions. In addition, 3 incidental findings were detected including an expansion of the trinucleotide repeat in ATXN3, a splice-sites variant in ATRX, and an ANXA11 missense mutation in a case of trisomy 21.CONCLUSION: Compared with chromosomal microarray analysis, whole genome sequencing increased the additional detection rate by 5.9% (11/185). Using whole genome sequencing, we detected not only aneu-ploidies and copy number variations, but also single nucleotide variations and insertions and deletions, trinucleotide repeat expansions, and exonic copy number variations with high accuracy in an acceptable turnaround time (3-4 weeks). Our results suggest that whole genome sequencing has the potential to be a new promising prenatal diagnostic test for fetal structural anomalies.
引用
收藏
页码:e1 / e18
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using optical genome mapping vs chromosomal microarray
    Hu, Ping
    Xu, Yiyun
    Zhang, Qinxin
    Zhou, Ran
    Ji, Xiuqing
    Wang, Yan
    Xu, Zhengfeng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (05) : e82 - e83
  • [2] Low-pass genome sequencing versus chromosomal microarray analysis: implementation in prenatal diagnosis
    Wang, Huilin
    Dong, Zirui
    Zhang, Rui
    Chau, Matthew Hoi Kin
    Yang, Zhenjun
    Tsang, Kathy Yin Ching
    Wong, Hoi Kin
    Gui, Baoheng
    Meng, Zhuo
    Xiao, Kelin
    Zhu, Xiaofan
    Wang, Yanfang
    Chen, Shaoyun
    Leung, Tak Yeung
    Cheung, Sau Wai
    Kwok, Yvonne K.
    Morton, Cynthia C.
    Zhu, Yuanfang
    Choy, Kwong Wai
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (03) : 500 - 510
  • [3] The role of chromosomal microarray and exome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis
    Chau, Matthew Hoi Kin
    Choy, Kwong Wai
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 33 (02) : 148 - 155
  • [4] Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Prenatal Diagnosis
    Lo, Jamie O.
    Shaffer, Brian L.
    Feist, Cori D.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2014, 69 (10) : 613 - 621
  • [5] Chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis
    Xie, Yingjun
    Sun, Xiaofang
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (02): : 177 - 179
  • [6] Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis
    Levy, Brynn
    Wapner, Ronald
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (02) : 201 - 212
  • [7] Prenatal genetic diagnosis of omphalocele by karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing
    Shi, Xiaomei
    Tang, Hui
    Lu, Jian
    Yang, Xiue
    Ding, Hongke
    Wu, Jing
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (01) : 1285 - 1291
  • [8] The Use of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis
    Stosic, Melissa
    Levy, Brynn
    Wapner, Ronald
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 45 (01) : 55 - +
  • [9] Prenatal craniofacial malformations should be analysed by whole exome sequencing in addition to chromosomal microarray analysis
    Michaelson-Cohen, Rachel
    Singer, Amihood
    Sagi-Dain, Lena
    Segel, Reeval
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (SUPPL 1) : 91 - 92
  • [10] Summary of the first Hungarian experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis and whole-exome sequencing
    Piko, Henriett
    Illes, Anett
    Nagy, Sandor
    Beke, Artur
    Arvai, Kristof
    Elekes, Tibor
    Horvath, Emese
    Ferenczy, Miklos
    Mosonyi, Peter
    Lukacs, Valeria
    Klujber, Valeria
    Torok, Olga
    Kiss, Zsuzsanna
    Tardy, Erika
    Tidrenczel, Zsolt
    Tobias, Balint
    Balla, Bernadett
    Lakatos, Peter
    Kosa, Janos
    Takacs, Istvan
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2024, 165 (14) : 523 - 530