Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision Making.

被引：0

作者：

Lane, Elizabeth A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA

来源：

PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS | 2023年 / 21卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1017/S1537592723000476

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：738 / 740

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] Persuading the Supreme Court: The Significance of Briefs in Judicial Decision-Making
Spooner, Rachel A.
POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2023, 138 (03) : 441 - 442
[2] Persuading the Supreme Court: The significance of briefs in judicial decision-making
Canelo, Kayla S.
INTEREST GROUPS & ADVOCACY, 2023, 12 (03) : 325 - 328
[3] Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making.
Sommer, Udi
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 2009, 43 (04) : 943 - 945
[4] Book Review of Persuading the Supreme Court: The significance of briefs in judicial decision-making : By Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle
Kayla S. Canelo
Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2023, 12 : 325 - 328
[5] Friends of the Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making.
Solberg, Rorie
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2010, 72 (01): : 266 - 267
[6] The Supreme Court: An Analytic History of Constitutional Decision Making.
Wedeking, Justin
PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2020, 18 (02) : 626 - 627
[7] Constitutional process: A social choice analysis of Supreme Court decision making.
Rogers, JR
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2003, 115 (03) : 501 - 506
[8] Anchorage in judicial decision making.
Fariña, F
Arce, R
Novo, M
PSICOTHEMA, 2002, 14 (01) : 39 - 46
[9] Constitutional process: A social choice analysis of Supreme Court decision making.
Hagle, TM
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2002, 96 (02) : 432 - 433
[10] Friend of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making
McGuire, Kevin T.
JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (02) : 229 - 232

← 1 2 3 4 5 →