Construct Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Test of Advanced Movement Skills with a Dual-Outcome Scoring System

被引:2
|
作者
Wu, Sz-Yan [1 ]
Kang, Hyeon-Ah [2 ]
Jensen, Jody L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Educ, 2109 San Jacinto Blvd,Stop D3700, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Educ Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Dual motor task; motor skill competence; factor analysis; structural equation modeling; item response theory; INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS; MOTOR COMPETENCE; PERFORMANCE; CHILDREN; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1080/1091367X.2022.2043329
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The objective was to verify the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the Test of Advanced Movement Skills (TAMS) with an innovative dual-outcome scoring system. Three statistical approaches - confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and item response theory analysis (IRT) - were applied to the data collected from 88 participants aged 9-12 years. Furthermore, 10 of them were randomly selected to examine the test-retest reliability by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The synthesis of findings from CFA, ESEM, and IRT analyses provides supportive evidence that two- and bi-factor structures demonstrated better model-data fit compared to the one-factor structure. An excellent level of test-retest reliability was confirmed in the TAMS (ICC = .96) and anthropometric instruments (ICC = .986-.998). We conclude that a composite score derived from the TAMS is sufficient and practical to measure one's general competence in advanced movement skills during late childhood.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 31
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development, Test-Retest Reliability, and Construct Validity of the Resistance Training Skills Battery
    Lubans, David R.
    Smith, Jordan J.
    Harries, Simon K.
    Barnett, Lisa M.
    Faigenbaum, Avery D.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (05) : 1373 - 1380
  • [2] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Standardized Video Interview
    Jayakumar, Kishore L.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (11) : 1599 - 1599
  • [3] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Experiential Discounting Task
    Smits, Rochelle R.
    Stein, Jeffrey S.
    Johnson, Patrick S.
    Odum, Amy L.
    Madden, Gregory J.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 21 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [4] Test-retest reliability and validity studies of the skills confidence inventory
    Parsons, E
    Betz, NE
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 1998, 6 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [5] The Neck Pain and Disability Scale: Test-retest reliability and construct validity
    Goolkasian, P
    Wheeler, AH
    Gretz, SS
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2002, 18 (04): : 245 - 250
  • [6] Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Brief Dark Triad Measurements
    Dragostinov, Yavor
    Mottus, Rene
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2023, 105 (02) : 143 - 148
  • [7] Reliability and construct validity of the advanced motor skills test
    Apache, RRG
    Campbell, Y
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2006, 77 (01) : A90 - A91
  • [8] Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the expanded skills confidence inventory
    Robinson, CH
    Betz, NE
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (04) : 407 - 422
  • [9] Action (verb) fluency: Test-retest reliability, normative standards, and construct validity
    Woods, SP
    Scott, JC
    Sires, DA
    Grant, I
    Heaton, RK
    Troster, AI
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 11 (04) : 408 - 415
  • [10] Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the cognitive style index for business undergraduates
    Murphy, HJ
    Kelleher, WE
    Doucette, PA
    Young, JD
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1998, 82 (02) : 595 - 600