Construction of antibacterial bone implants and their application in bone regeneration

被引:26
|
作者
Feng, Pei [1 ]
He, Ruizhong [1 ]
Gu, Yulong [1 ]
Yang, Feng [1 ]
Pan, Hao [2 ,3 ]
Shuai, Cijun [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, State Key Lab Precis Mfg Extreme Serv Performance, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Stomatol Hosp, Xiangya Sch Stomatol, Dept Periodont & Oral Mucosal Sect, Changsha 410013, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Sch Stomatol, Changsha 410013, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangxi Univ Sci & Technol, Inst addit Mfg, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
[5] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Mech Engn, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
BIOACTIVE GLASS SCAFFOLDS; BIOFILM FORMATION; GRAPHENE OXIDE; PHASE-CHANGE; COMPOSITE; NANOPARTICLES; HYDROGEL; DELIVERY; RELEASE; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1039/d3mh01298k
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Bacterial infection represents a prevalent challenge during the bone repair process, often resulting in implant failure. However, the extensive use of antibiotics has limited local antibacterial effects at the infection site and is prone to side effects. In order to address the issue of bacterial infection during the transplantation of bone implants, four types of bone scaffold implants with long-term antimicrobial functionality have been constructed, including direct contact antimicrobial scaffold, dissolution-penetration antimicrobial scaffold, photocatalytic antimicrobial scaffold, and multimodal synergistic antimicrobial scaffold. The direct contact antimicrobial scaffold involves the physical penetration or disruption of bacterial cell membranes by the scaffold surface or hindrance of bacterial adhesion through surface charge, microstructure, and other factors. The dissolution-penetration antimicrobial scaffold releases antimicrobial substances from the scaffold's interior through degradation and other means to achieve local antimicrobial effects. The photocatalytic antimicrobial scaffold utilizes the absorption of light to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) with enhanced chemical reactivity for antimicrobial activity. ROS can cause damage to bacterial cell membranes, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), proteins, and other components. The multimodal synergistic antimicrobial scaffold involves the combined use of multiple antimicrobial methods to achieve synergistic effects and effectively overcome the limitations of individual antimicrobial approaches. Additionally, the biocompatibility issues of the antimicrobial bone scaffold are also discussed, including in vitro cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation, as well as in vivo bone repair and vascularization. Finally, the challenges and prospects of antimicrobial bone implants are summarized. The development of antimicrobial bone implants can provide effective solutions to bacterial infection issues in bone defect repair in the foreseeable future. In order to address the issue of bacterial infection during the transplantation of bone implants, four types of bone implants with long-term antimicrobial functionality have been constructed.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 625
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nanostructured Surface Modification to Bone Implants for Bone Regeneration
    Wang, Quan
    Huang, Yixing
    Qian, Zhiyong
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 14 (04) : 628 - 648
  • [2] Enhanced bone regeneration and formation around implants using guided bone regeneration
    Bhumbra, RS
    Berman, AB
    Walker, PS
    Barrett, DS
    Blunn, GW
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1998, 43 (02): : 162 - 167
  • [3] Electrotherapy for bone regeneration in dental implants
    Buzza, Edmur
    Olate, Sergio
    Pozzer, Leandro
    de Albergaria-Barbosa, Jose Ricardo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY, 2014, 32 (02): : 684 - 689
  • [4] Application of nanoparticles as surface modifiers of dental implants for revascularization/regeneration of bone
    Soe, Zar Chi
    Wahyudi, Rahman
    Mattheos, Nikos
    Lertpimonchai, Attawood
    Everts, Vincent
    Tompkins, Kevin A.
    Osathanon, Thanaphum
    Limjeerajarus, Chalida Nakalekha
    Limjeerajarus, Nuttapol
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [5] A comparative study of anorganic xenogenic bone and autogenous bone implants for bone regeneration in rabbits
    Young, C
    Sandstedt, P
    Skoglund, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1999, 14 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [6] Effect of guided bone regeneration on bone quality surrounding dental implants
    Johnson, Trenton B.
    Siderits, Ben
    Nye, Seth
    Jeong, Yong-Hoon
    Han, Seung-Hee
    Rhyu, In-Chul
    Han, Jung-Suk
    Deguchi, Toru
    Beck, F. Michael
    Kim, Do-Gyoon
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 80 : 166 - 170
  • [7] Antibacterial Membrane with a Bone-Like Structure for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Zhang, YuYuan
    Mao, WeiJia
    Wang, Jian
    Li, Quan-Li
    Mei, May Lei
    Chu, Chun Hung
    Xia, Rong
    Zhang, Zhi-Hong
    JOURNAL OF NANOMATERIALS, 2015, 2015
  • [9] In situ silver-doped antibacterial bioactive glass for bone regeneration application
    Shendage, Shital S.
    Gaikwad, Kajal
    Kachare, Kranti
    Kashte, Shivaji
    Chang, Jia-Yaw
    Ghule, Anil Vithal
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2024, 59 (24) : 10744 - 10762
  • [10] The Current Progress of Tetrahedral DNA Nanostructure for Antibacterial Application and Bone Tissue Regeneration
    Hong, Shebin
    Jiang, Weidong
    Ding, Qinfeng
    Lin, Kaili
    Zhao, Cancan
    Wang, Xudong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE, 2023, 18 : 3761 - 3780