Evaluation of phakic intraocular lens power calculation using the new Linz-Homburg-Castrop formula and comparison with four conventional methods

被引:4
|
作者
Wendelstein, Jascha A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hinterberger, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [5 ]
Hirnschall, Nino [1 ,2 ]
Koss, Michael J. [6 ]
Langenbucher, Achim [3 ]
Jirak, Paul [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Bolz, Matthias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Fac Med, Linz, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Kepler Univ Hosp GmbH, Dept Ophthalmol & Optometry, Linz, Austria
[3] Univ Saarland, Inst Expt Ophthalmol, Homburg, Germany
[4] IROC Inst Refrakt & Ophthalmochirurg, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rauxel, Germany
[6] Augenzentrum Nymphenburger Hofe Munchen, Munich, Germany
[7] Eyelaser Clin, Linz, Austria
来源
关键词
IMPLANTABLE COLLAMER LENS; REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES; CONTACT-LENS; HIGH MYOPIA; HYPEROPIA; LASIK; SMILE; LONG;
D O I
10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001055
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) power calculation in a middle European patient cohort. Setting: EyeLaser Clinic, Linz, Austria. Design: Single-center single-surgeon retrospective consecutive case series. Methods: Patients were included after uneventful pIOL surgery implanting 91 nontoric and toric Visian implantable collamer lens model V4c. Online Calculation and Ordering System (OCOS) software, JPhakic software, Olsen-Feingold formula, Holladay formula, and Linz-Homburg-Castrop (LHC) formula were compared. When possible, lens constants were optimized for the patient cohort. Data of single eye per patient were included. Outcome measures were mean absolute prediction error, median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD, and median prediction error, as well as the percentage of eyes with an absolute prediction error within limits of 0.25 diopters (D), 0.5 D, 0.75 D, and 1.0 D. Results: 91 eyes of 91 patients were assessed. After application of the Cochran Q test, the Olsen-Feingold formula achieved a significantly lower percentage of eyes within an absolute prediction error of 1.0 D than all other methods. Conclusions: In the patient cohort, OCOS software, JPhakic software, and Holladay and LHC formulas showed equal results and can be cross-checked. The LHC formula was not published before. A ready-to-use Excel sheet is available as an addendum.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 125
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Considerations on the Castrop formula for calculation of intraocular lens power
    Langenbucher, Achim
    Szentmary, Nora
    Cayless, Alan
    Weisensee, Johannes
    Fabian, Ekkehard
    Wendelstein, Jascha
    Hoffmann, Peter
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [2] Intraocular lens power calculation in the elderly population using the Kane formula in comparison with existing methods
    Reitblat, Olga
    Gali, Helena E.
    Chou, Linda
    Bahar, Irit
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    Afshari, Natalie A.
    Sella, Ruti
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (11): : 1501 - 1507
  • [3] Comparison of Phakic Intraocular Lens Vault Using Conventional Nomogram and Prediction Formulas
    Ando, Wakako
    Kamiya, Kazutaka
    Hayakawa, Hideki
    Takahashi, Masahide
    Shoji, Nobuyuki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 8
  • [4] Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation by the IOLMaster in Phakic and Eyes with Hydrophobic Acrylic Lenses
    Chang, Shu-Wen
    Yu, Chin-Yen
    Chen, Daniel P.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (07) : 1336 - 1342
  • [5] Intraocular lens power calculation formula accuracy: Comparison of 12 formulas for a trifocal hydrophilic intraocular lens
    Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos
    Colmenero-Reina, Elvira
    Flikier, David
    Castro-Alonso, Francisco-Javier
    Rodriguez-Raton, Alvaro
    Garcia-Madrona, Jose-Luis
    Peraza-Nieves, Jorge
    Sanchez-Gonzalez, Jose-Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (06) : 2981 - 2988
  • [6] Comparison of accuracy of different intraocular lens power calculation methods using artificial intelligence
    Nemeth, Gabor
    Kemeny-Beke, Adam
    Modis, Laszlo, Jr.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 235 - 241
  • [7] A new formula for intraocular lens power calculation after refractive corneal surgery
    Camellin, M
    Calossi, A
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 22 (02) : 187 - 199
  • [8] Comparison of methods to measure corneal power for intraocular lens power calculation using a rotating Scheimpflug camera
    Savini, Giacomo
    Barboni, Piero
    Carbonelli, Michele
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (04): : 598 - 604
  • [9] Comparison of different formulas for intraocular lens power calculation using a new optical biometer
    Kaya, F.
    Kocak, I.
    Aydin, A.
    Baybora, H.
    Karabela, Y.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2015, 38 (08): : 717 - 722
  • [10] VRF-G, a New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula: A 13-Formulas Comparison Study
    Hipolito-Fernandes, Diogo
    Luis, Maria Elisa
    Gil, Pedro
    Maduro, Vitor
    Feijao, Joao
    Yeo, Tun Kuan
    Voytsekhivskyy, Oleksiy
    Alves, Nuno
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 4395 - 4402