The Translated Proximal Humerus Fracture: A Comparison of Operative and Nonoperative Management

被引:6
|
作者
Cosic, Filip [1 ,7 ]
Kirzner, Nathan [1 ]
Edwards, Elton [1 ,2 ]
Page, Richard [3 ,4 ]
Kimmel, Lara [2 ,5 ]
Gabbe, Belinda [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] The Alfred, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Hosp Geelong, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Geelong, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, St John God Hosp, Barwon Ctr Orthopaed Res & Educ B CORE, Geelong, Australia
[5] The Alfred, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Australia
[6] Swansea Univ, Swansea Univ Med Sch, Hlth Data Res UK, Singleton Pk, Swansea, Wales
[7] The Alfred, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
humeral fracture; proximal; internal fixation; shoulder fractures; fracture fixation; internal; arthroplasty; replacement; shoulder; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PREVALENCE; INFECTION; NONUNION; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0000000000002612
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives:To report on the long-term outcomes of the management of translated proximal humerus fractures.Design:A prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to December 2018.Setting:Academic Level 1 trauma center.Participants/Patients:A total of 108 patients with a proximal humerus fracture with & GE;100% translation, defined as no cortical bony contact between the shaft and humeral head fragments, were included.Intervention:Patients were managed nonoperatively with sling immobilization or with operative management as determined by the treating surgeon.Main Outcome Measures:Outcome measures were the Oxford Shoulder Score, EQ-5D-5L, return to work, and radiological outcomes. Complications recorded included further surgery, loss of position/fixation, nonunion/malunion, and avascular necrosis.Results:Of the 108 patients, 76 underwent operative intervention and 32 were managed nonoperatively. The mean (SD) age in the operative group was 54.3 (& PLUSMN;20.2) years and in the nonoperative group was 73.3 (& PLUSMN;15.3) years (P < 0.001). There was no association between Oxford Shoulder Score and management options (mean 38.5 [& PLUSMN;9.5] operative versus mean 41.3 [& PLUSMN;8.5] nonoperative, P = 0.48). Operative management was associated with improved health status outcomes; EQ-5D utility score adjusted mean difference was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.04-0.27; P = 0.008); EQ-5D VAS adjusted mean difference was 19.2 (95% CI, 5.2-33.2; P = 0.008). Operative management was associated with a lower odds of nonunion (adjusted OR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; P = 0.04), malunion (adjusted OR 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.51; P = 0.003), and complications (adjusted OR 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.32; P = 0.001).Conclusion:Translated proximal humerus fractures with & GE;100% displacement demonstrate improved health status and radiological outcomes after surgical fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:E341 / E348
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proximal humerus fracture - Closed reduction of the dislocation and nonoperative management of the fracture - Opinion
    Creevy, W
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2001, 15 (02) : 148 - 148
  • [2] Intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur Operative versus nonoperative management
    Mohid Bhandari
    Joseph R
    Beate P. Hanson
    Dan C. Norvell
    中华创伤骨科杂志, 2004, (05) : 92 - 96
  • [3] The translated two-part fracture of the proximal humerus
    Rajesh, KR
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (05): : 775 - 776
  • [4] How do surgeons decide when to treat proximal humerus fractures with operative versus nonoperative management?
    Reed, Logan A.
    Hao, Kevin A. A.
    Patch, David A.
    King, Joseph J.
    Fedorka, Catherine
    Ahn, Jaimo
    Strelzow, Jason A.
    Hebert-Davies, Jonah
    Little, Milton T. M.
    Krause, Peter C.
    Johnson, Joseph P.
    Spitler, Clay A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 33 (08): : 3683 - 3691
  • [5] How do surgeons decide when to treat proximal humerus fractures with operative versus nonoperative management?
    Logan A. Reed
    Kevin A. Hao
    David A. Patch
    Joseph J. King
    Catherine Fedorka
    Jaimo Ahn
    Jason A. Strelzow
    Jonah Hebert-Davies
    Milton T. M. Little
    Peter C. Krause
    Joseph P. Johnson
    Clay A. Spitler
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2023, 33 : 3683 - 3691
  • [6] Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Song, Hae-Ryong
    Song, Mi Hyun
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (06) : 1022 - 1028
  • [7] Operative treatment of malunion of a fracture of the proximal aspect of the humerus
    Beredjiklian, PK
    Iannotti, JP
    Norris, TR
    Williams, GR
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (10): : 1484 - 1497
  • [8] Proximal Humerus Geriatric Fracture Care: Fix, Replace, or Nonoperative Treatment?
    O'Donnell, Jeffrey A.
    Gage, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2021, 35 : S6 - S10
  • [9] The translated two-part fracture of the proximal humerus - Reply
    Court-Brown, CM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (05): : 776 - 776
  • [10] The operative management of displaced fractures of the proximal humerus
    Hoffmeyer, P
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (04): : 469 - 480