Exploring the Variability of Human Factors and Usability Testing Methods for Evaluating Medical Devices - Preliminary Results

被引:0
|
作者
Kimalel, Ozelle [1 ]
Magee, Justin D. M. [1 ]
Boyd, Kyle [1 ]
Bond, Raymond [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
UX research methods; Usability testing; Human factors; Medical devices; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1145/3605655.3605788
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The success of a medical device is based on its ability to be deployed according to its use specification to safely achieve the intended outcome. Central to this is the design of the device which, if poorly executed, contributes to 'use error' which affects the efficacy, safety, and user experience of a medical device. Human factors guidance provides recommendations to evaluate the user experience in a bid to improve design efforts and ultimately the safety and usability of medical devices. The heterogeneity of the industry means that the interpretation of these guidelines is subjective and adapted differently to suit the use specification of the devices. The aim of this study is to explore the perceptions of medical device industry professionals on factors influencing the evaluation of the user experience in the design of medical devices. A bespoke survey approach is currently being undertaken to achieve this objective and to interrogate the key issues. There is a lack of substantial evidence in the literature that indicates which user experience testing methods are most favoured and widely used in practice, across all stages of device development from concept to post-sales testing. This study is designed to shed light on industry practices; the variability of user experience testing methods of medical devices, as well as the preferred methods, and the aspects of user experience considered in medical device design.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of Human Factors Methods: Usability Testing in the Radiation Oncology Environment
    Warkentin, H.
    Bubric, K.
    Giovannetti, H.
    Graham, G.
    Clay, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3519 - 3519
  • [2] Usability Testing of Medical Devices, 2nd edition
    Lewis, Bridget A.
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2018, 26 (02) : 24 - 24
  • [3] Usability Testing Results for a Mobile Medical Transition Application
    Dixon, Jeremy
    Dehlinger, Josh
    Dixon, Shannan DeLany
    Chakraborty, Joyram
    DESIGN, USER EXPERIENCE, AND USABILITY: NOVEL USER EXPERIENCES, PT II, 2016, 9747 : 569 - 577
  • [4] Improving the User Experience of Medical Devices with Comparative Usability Testing
    Tosine, Anneliis
    Al-Jaber, Hala
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN HEALTHCARE, 2017, 482 : 239 - 249
  • [5] Usability and human factors of driver-information-systems: Methods, studies and results
    Rößger, P.
    2001, VDI Verlag GMBH
  • [6] Usability and human factors of driver-information-systems:: Methods, studies and results
    Rössger, P
    ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS FOR VEHICLES, 2001, 1646 : 911 - 926
  • [7] Evaluating the usability and safety of the semaglutide single-dose pen-injectors through summative (human factors) usability testing
    Klonoff, David C.
    Bassock, Stephanie
    Dwyer, Andrea
    Engels, Ella
    Qvist, Marianne
    Sparre, Thomas
    Snitker, Soren
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2021, 12 (06) : 978 - 987
  • [8] Evaluating thermal and image intensification night vision devices for the ground environment: Human factors and usability issues
    Best, PS
    Collins, DJ
    Piccione, D
    Ferrett, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE 1998 NATIONAL AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE, 1998, : 295 - 301
  • [9] The recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin prefilled pen: results of patient and nurse human factors usability testing
    Saunders, Helen
    Schertz, Joan C.
    Hecker, Clara
    Lang, Barbara
    Arriagada, Pablo
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2012, 9 (08) : 893 - 900
  • [10] Genetic contributions to regional variability in human brain structure: Methods and preliminary results
    Wright, IC
    Sham, P
    Murray, RM
    Weinberger, DR
    Bullmore, ET
    NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (01) : 256 - 271