Multifactor configurations of coal power technology in China substantially differ in life-cycle environmental impacts

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Junjie [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yulong [1 ]
Wang, Yirong [1 ]
Wang, Jia [1 ]
Cao, Zimeng [1 ]
Hu, Kexin [1 ]
Li, Menggang [3 ,4 ]
Lu, Xi [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Engn Res Ctr Clean & Low carbon Technol Intelligen, Sch Environm, Minist Educ, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Natl Acad Econ Secur, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Beijing Lab Natl Econ Secur Early Warning Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[6] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[7] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Lab Environm Frontier Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Electrical energy; Operating parameter; Boiler type; Cooling approach; Turbine mode; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; CARBON EMISSIONS; ENERGY USE; WATER; CONSUMPTION; CAPTURE; SYSTEM; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168132
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The expansion of coal power in China has led to a coexistence of multiple technologies, whereas differences in environmental impacts of each other remain hitherto unclear. This gap is largely a result of the difficulty of fully covering the factors that significantly affect environmental performances and the lack of fine data inventory. The limitation welcomes an approach that can go well beyond characterizing coal power technology with a single factor. To this end, we surveyed the information data for all coal power units in China to couple four factors (viz. operating parameter, boiler type, cooling approach, and turbine mode) into 22 types of multifactor technology configurations, as well as the first-hand operating data of nearly half of all coal power units in China to compile an elaborate data inventory that each configuration includes 88 input and output data. These fine data were modeled by the life cycle assessment method of CML 2016 to quantify twelve environmental impact categories. The results show substantial differences in environmental impacts exist for different technology configurations. High operating parameters gain environmental friendliness but the diversification of boiler type and cooling approach to improve the applicability of coal quality and water resources increases environmental impacts. The insignificant impact of the turbine mode is owning to the exergy allocation that eliminates the quality gap in electrical and thermal energy. The technology-level differences are aggregated into the provincial level by various configuration structures, which show markedly spatial heterogeneity varying by impact categories. This implies a great potential for structural adjustment and an overall improvement requires cleaner production beyond that, focused on the coal power generation process and its upstream coal supply process. Our modeling shows a majority of results with an uncertainty of lower than 10 %, which is robust for the proposal of policy suggestions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reducing life-cycle environmental impacts of coal-power by using coal-mine methane
    Sliwinska, Anna
    Czaplicka-Kolarz, Krystyna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2013, 37 (09) : 1044 - 1058
  • [2] A life-cycle comparison of the energy, environmental and economic impacts of coal versus wood pellets for generating heat in China
    Wang, Changbo
    Chang, Yuan
    Zhang, Lixiao
    Pang, Mingyue
    Hao, Yan
    ENERGY, 2017, 120 : 374 - 384
  • [3] Assessing environmental impacts in a life-cycle perspective
    Hauschild, MZ
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (04) : 81A - 88A
  • [4] Life-cycle environmental impacts of barley straw valorisation
    Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo
    Rahimifard, Shahin
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 149 : 1 - 11
  • [5] Preliminary Comparative Life-Cycle Impacts of Streetlight Technology
    Dale, Alexander T.
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    Marriott, Joe
    Hartley, Douglas
    Jurgens, Cassie
    Zatcoff, Eric
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2011, 17 (04) : 193 - 199
  • [6] Perovskite photovoltaics: life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental impacts
    Gong, Jian
    Darling, Seth B.
    You, Fengqi
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 8 (07) : 1953 - 1968
  • [7] The Future of Toner: Life-Cycle Inventory, Impacts and Environmental Technologies
    Williamson, Anahita A.
    Hilton, Brian
    Winnebeck, Kate
    DIGITAL FABRICATION 2011/ NIP27- 27TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL PRINTING TECHNOLOGIES: TECHNICAL PROGRAMS AND PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 2011, : 716 - 721
  • [8] Life-cycle environmental and cost impacts of reusing fly ash
    Huang, T. Y.
    Chiueh, P. T.
    Lo, S. L.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 123 : 255 - 260
  • [9] A comprehensive comparison of the life-cycle environmental impacts of traditional and returnable express delivery packaging in China
    Zhou, Keren
    Song, Yueyao
    Xian, Xuehua
    Liu, Yili
    Fang, Wen
    Liu, Dianlei
    Jia, Yufeng
    Liu, Jianguo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [10] Life-cycle environmental impacts of CRT and LCD desktop monitors
    Socolof, ML
    Overly, JG
    Kincaid, LE
    Dhingra, R
    Singh, D
    Hart, KM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2001, : 119 - 127