Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany

被引:3
|
作者
Mutschler, Manuel [1 ,2 ]
Naendrup, Jan-Hendrik [3 ,4 ]
Pfeiffer, Thomas R. [3 ]
Jaecker, Vera [3 ]
Arbab, Dariusch [1 ,5 ]
Shafizadeh, Sven [1 ,6 ]
Buchhorn, Tomas [7 ]
机构
[1] Witten Herdecke Univ, Alfred Herrhausen Str 50, D-58448 Witten, Germany
[2] Johanniter GmbH, Dept Foot Surg, Waldkrankenhaus Bonn, Waldstr 73, D-53177 Bonn, Germany
[3] Witten Herdecke Univ, Cologne Merheim Med Ctr, Dept Trauma Surg Orthopaed Surg & Sports Traumato, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Cologne, Dept Oncol Haematol Infectiol & Internist Crit Ca, Cologne, Germany
[5] Klinikum Dortmund, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dortmund, Germany
[6] Sana Med Ctr Cologne, Dept Trauma Surg Orthopaed Surg & Sports Traumato, Cologne, Germany
[7] Sporthopaedicum Straubing Regensburg, Foot & Ankle Dept, Straubing, Germany
关键词
Ankle syndesmotic injury; Syndesmotic screw fixation; Suture-button; MRI; Arthroscopy; ANKLE SYNDESMOSIS; TIBIOFIBULAR SYNDESMOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CLINICAL-TESTS; 3.0; TESLA; LESIONS; SPRAIN; PREVALENCE; CARTILAGE; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-022-04423-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Although non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries of the ankle are relatively rare, they may lead to poor clinical outcome if initially undiagnosed or managed improperly. Despite a variety of literature regarding possibilities for treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries, little is known about effective applications of different therapeutic methods in day-to-day work. The aim of this study was to assess the current status of the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany. Materials and methods An online-questionnaire, capturing the routine diagnostic workup including clinical examination, radiologic assessment and treatment strategies, was sent to all members of the German Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (DGOU) and Association of Arthroscopic and Joint Surgery (AGA). Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft excel and SPSS. Results Each question of the questionnaire was on average answered by 431 +/- 113 respondents. External rotation stress test (66%), squeeze test (61%) and forced dorsiflexion test (40%) were most commonly used for the clinical examination. In the diagnostic workup, most clinicians relied on MRI (83%) and conventional X-ray analysis (anterior-posterior 58%, lateral 41%, mortise view 38%). Only 15% of the respondents stated that there is a role for arthroscopic evaluation for the assessment of isolated syndesmotic injuries. Most frequently used fixation techniques included syndesmotic screw fixation (80%, 42% one syndesmotic screw, 38% two syndesmotic screws), followed by suture-button devices in 13%. Syndesmotic screw fixation was mainly performed tricortically (78%). While 50% of the respondents stated that syndesmotic screw fixation and suture-button devices are equivalent in the treatment of isolated syndesmotic injuries with respect to clinical outcome, 36% answered that syndesmotic screw fixation is superior compared to suture-button devices. Conclusions While arthroscopy and suture-button devices do not appear to be widely used, syndesmotic screw fixation after diagnostic work-up by MRI seems to be the common treatment algorithm for non-fracture-related syndesmotic injuries in Germany.
引用
收藏
页码:2019 / 2026
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current status of the management of isolated syndesmotic injuries in Germany
    Manuel Mutschler
    Jan-Hendrik Naendrup
    Thomas R. Pfeiffer
    Vera Jaecker
    Dariusch Arbab
    Sven Shafizadeh
    Tomas Buchhorn
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 2019 - 2026
  • [2] Current Strategies in the Management of Syndesmotic Injuries
    Khazai, Ravand S.
    Weatherford, Brian M.
    TECHNIQUES IN FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2018, 17 (03): : 126 - 135
  • [3] Management of syndesmotic injuries of the ankle
    de-las-Heras Romero, Jorge
    Lledo Alvarez, Ana Maria
    Moreno Sanchez, Fernando
    Perez Garcia, Alejandro
    Garcia Porcel, Pedro Antonio
    Valverde Sarabia, Raul
    Hernandez Torralba, Marina
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2017, 2 (09): : 403 - 409
  • [4] Management of syndesmotic injuries: What is the evidence?
    Schnetzke, Marc
    Vetter, Sven Y.
    Beisemann, Nils
    Swartman, Benedict
    Grutzner, Paul A.
    Franke, Jochen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 7 (11): : 718 - 725
  • [5] Management of distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: A snapshot of current practice
    Monga, Puneet
    Kumar, Aravind
    Simons, Adrian
    Panikker, Vivek
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2008, 74 (03): : 365 - 369
  • [6] Outcome of flexible fixation for acute isolated syndesmotic injuries
    El-Azab, Hossam
    Hafez, Abdel Rhman
    Mohamed, Mohamed A.
    Elsayed, Moustafa
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [7] Management of Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries in Children and Adolescents
    Shore, Benjamin J.
    Kramer, Dennis E.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 36 (04) : S11 - S14
  • [8] Syndesmotic Injuries
    Hofbauer, Mark H.
    Babu, Sriya S.
    CLINICS IN PODIATRIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 41 (03) : 491 - 502
  • [9] Conservative and surgical management of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines
    van Dijk, C. Niek
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Loppini, Mattia
    Florio, Pino
    Maltese, Ludovica
    Ciuffreda, Mauro
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (04) : 1217 - 1227
  • [10] Current status of nonoperative management of liver injuries
    Maull, KI
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 25 (11) : 1403 - 1404