Reliability and Feasibility of Low-Field-Strength Fetal MRI at 0.55 T during Pregnancy

被引:18
|
作者
Verdera, Jordina Aviles [1 ,2 ]
Story, Lisa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hall, Megan [1 ,3 ]
Finck, Tom [3 ,4 ]
Egloff, Alexia [2 ]
Seed, Paul T. [1 ,3 ]
Malik, Shaihan J. [1 ,2 ]
Rutherford, Mary A. [1 ,2 ]
Hajnal, Joseph, V [1 ,2 ]
Tomi-Tricot, Raphael [5 ]
Hutter, Jana [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, St Thomas Hosp, Sch Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, Ctr Developing Brain, 1st Floor South Wing,Westminster Bridge Rd, London SE1 7EH, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Ctr Med, Sch Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, Biomed Engn Dept, London, England
[3] GSTT, Womens Hlth, London, England
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
[5] Siemens Healthcare Ltd, MR Res Collaborat, Camberley, England
[6] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Radiol Inst, Erlangen, Germany
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
PLACENTA; PRETERM; TRIMESTER; BIOMETRY;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.223050
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The benefits of using low-field-strength fetal MRI to evaluate antenatal development include reduced image artifacts, increased comfort, larger bore size, and potentially reduced costs, but studies about fetal low-field-strength MRI are lacking.Purpose: To evaluate the reliability and feasibility of low-field-strength fetal MRI to assess anatomic and functional measures in pregnant participants using a commercially available 0.55-T MRI scanner and a comprehensive 20-minute protocol.Materials and Methods: This prospective study was performed at a large teaching hospital (St Thomas' Hospital; London, England) from May to November 2022 in healthy pregnant participants and participants with pregnancy-related abnormalities using a commercially available 0.55-T MRI scanner. A 20-minute protocol was acquired including anatomic T2-weighted fast-spin-echo, quantitative T2*, and diffusion sequences. Key measures like biparietal diameter, transcerebellar diameter, lung volume, and cervical length were evalu-ated by two radiologists and an MRI-experienced obstetrician. Functional organ-specific mean values were given. Comparison was per-formed with existing published values and higher-field MRI using linear regression, interobserver correlation, and Bland-Altman plots.Results: A total of 79 fetal MRI examinations were performed (mean gestational age, 29.4 weeks +/- 5.5 [SD] [age range, 17.6-39.3 weeks]; maternal age, 34.4 years +/- 5.3 [age range, 18.4-45.5 years]) in 47 healthy pregnant participants (control participants) and in 32 participants with pregnancy-related abnormalities. The key anatomic two-dimensional measures for the 47 healthy participants agreed with large cross-sectional 1.5-T and 3-T control studies. The interobserver correlations for the biparietal diameter in the first 40 consecutive scans were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.7, 0.99; P = .002) for abnormalities and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86, 0.97; P < .001) for control participants. Functional features, including placental and brain T2* and placental apparent diffusion coefficient values, strongly correlated with gestational age (mean placental T2* in the control participants: 5.2 msec of decay per week; R-2 = 0.66; mean T2* at 30 weeks, 176.6 msec; P < .001).Conclusion: The 20-minute low-field-strength fetal MRI examination protocol was capable of producing reliable structural and functional measures of the fetus and placenta in pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low-Field-Strength Body MRI: Challenges and Opportunities at 0.55 T
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Ludwig, Daniel R.
    Ippolito, Joseph E.
    Andrews, Trevor J.
    Narra, Vamsi R.
    Fraum, Tyler J.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2023, 43 (12)
  • [2] The Potential of Low-Field-Strength MRI for Simpler Fetal Scanning
    Gowland, Penny A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (01)
  • [3] Does Field Strength Matter? The Move toward Low-Field-Strength MRI
    Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
    McGee, Kiaran P.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2023, 43 (12)
  • [4] Open low-field-strength MRI of the shoulder is not so bad
    Thomsen, HS
    Larsen, L
    Chabanova, E
    Moller, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (02) : 541 - 542
  • [5] Open low-field-strength MRI of the shoulder is not so bad
    Thomsen, HS
    Larsen, L
    Chabanova, E
    Moller, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (06) : 1601 - 1602
  • [6] Comparison of high-field-strength versus low-field-strength MRI of the shoulder
    Magee, T
    Shapiro, M
    Williams, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (05) : 1211 - 1215
  • [7] Structural and functional fetal cardiac imaging using low field (0.55 T) MRI
    Zhang, Charlie Yuli
    Cleri, Michela
    Woodgate, Tomas
    Ramirez Gilliland, Paula
    Bansal, Simi
    Aviles Verdera, Jordina
    Uus, Alena U.
    Kyriakopoulou, Vanessa
    St Clair, Kamilah
    Story, Lisa
    Hall, Megan
    Pushparajah, Kuberan
    Hajnal, Joseph V.
    Lloyd, David
    Rutherford, Mary A.
    Hutter, Jana
    Payette, Kelly
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 12
  • [8] Open low-field-strength MRI of the shoulder is not so bad - Reply
    Magee, T
    Shapiro, M
    Williams, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (02) : 542 - 543
  • [9] Point-of-Care Low-Field-Strength MRI Is Moving Beyond the Hype
    Anzai, Yoshimi
    Moy, Linda
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 305 (03) : 672 - 673
  • [10] Low-field 0.55 T MRI evaluation of the fetus
    Skorn Ponrartana
    HaiThuy N. Nguyen
    Sophia X. Cui
    Ye Tian
    Prakash Kumar
    John C. Wood
    Krishna S. Nayak
    Pediatric Radiology, 2023, 53 : 1469 - 1475