Assessment of intrafractional prostate motion and its dosimetric impact in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy with gating

被引:10
|
作者
Xiong, Yuqing [1 ]
Rabe, Moritz [1 ]
Nierer, Lukas [1 ]
Kawula, Maria [1 ]
Corradini, Stefanie [1 ]
Belka, Claus [1 ,2 ]
Riboldi, Marco [3 ]
Landry, Guillaume [1 ]
Kurz, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Munich, Germany
[2] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen LMU Munich, Dept Med Phys, Munich, Germany
关键词
MR linac; Prostate cancer; Organ motion; MRI-guided radiotherapy; Dose reconstruction; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-022-02005-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the intrafractional prostate motion captured during gated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer and analyze its impact on the delivered dose as well as the effect of gating. Methods Sagittal 2D cine-MRI scans were acquired at 4 Hz during treatment at a ViewRay MRIdian (ViewRay Inc., Oakwood Village, OH, USA) MR linac. Prostate shifts in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) directions were extracted separately. Using the static dose cloud approximation, the planned fractional dose was shifted according to the 2D gated motion (residual motion in gating window) to estimate the delivered dose by superimposing and averaging the shifted dose volumes. The dose of a hypothetical non-gated delivery was reconstructed similarly using the non-gated motion. For the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder, dose-volume histogram parameters of the planned and reconstructed doses were compared. Results In total, 174 fractions (15.7 h of cine-MRI) from 10 patients were evaluated. The average (+/- 1 sigma) non-gated prostate motion was 0.6 +/- 1.0 mm in the AP and 0.0 +/- 0.6 mm in the SI direction with respect to the centroid position of the gating boundary. 95% of the shifts were within [-3.5, 2.7] mm in the AP and [-2.9, 3.2] mm in the SI direction. For the gated treatment and averaged over all fractions, CTV D-98% decreased by less than 2% for all patients. The rectum and the bladder D-2% increased by less than 3% and 0.5%, respectively. Doses reconstructed for gated and non-gated delivery were similar for most fractions. Conclusion A pipeline for extraction of prostate motion during gated MRI-guided radiotherapy based on 2D cine-MRI was implemented. The 2D motion data enabled an approximate estimation of the delivered dose. For the majority of fractions, the benefit of gating was negligible, and clinical dosimetric constraints were met, indicating safety of the currently adopted gated MRI-guided treatment workflow.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 553
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of intrafractional prostate motion and its dosimetric impact in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy with gating
    Yuqing Xiong
    Moritz Rabe
    Lukas Nierer
    Maria Kawula
    Stefanie Corradini
    Claus Belka
    Marco Riboldi
    Guillaume Landry
    Christopher Kurz
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2023, 199 : 544 - 553
  • [2] MRI guided online adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion in patients with cervical cancer
    Ding, Shouliang
    Piao, Zun
    Chen, Meining
    Li, Fanghua
    Li, Yongbao
    Liu, Biaoshui
    Liu, Hongdong
    Huang, Xiaoyan
    Li, Junyun
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 50
  • [3] Gating has a negligible impact on dose delivered in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer
    Wahlstedt, Isak
    Andratschke, Nicolaus
    Behrens, Claus P.
    Ehrbar, Stefanie
    Gabrys, Hubert S.
    Schuler, Helena Garcia
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Smith, Abraham George
    Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
    Tascon-Vidarte, Jose D.
    Vogelius, Ivan R.
    van Timmeren, Janita E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : 205 - 212
  • [4] Dosimetric assessment of intra-fraction motion during online adaptive MRI-guided RT
    Stanescu, Teo
    Semeniuk, Oleksii
    Shessel, Andrea
    Velec, Michael
    Yan, Michael
    Mesci, Aruz
    Kim, John
    Dawson, Laura
    Hosni, Ali
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4403 - S4404
  • [5] Dosimetric Benefit of MRI-guided online adaptive Radiotherapy: An Analysis of 154 Fractions
    Nierer, L.
    Hofmaier, J.
    Mendes, V.
    Braun, J.
    Thum, P.
    Walter, F.
    von Bestenbostel, R.
    Kurz, C.
    Landry, G.
    Reiner, M.
    Niyazi, M.
    Belka, C.
    Corradini, S.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2021, 197 (SUPPL 1) : S65 - S65
  • [6] Multislice motion modeling for MRI-guided radiotherapy gating
    Ginn, John S.
    Ruan, Dan
    Low, Daniel A.
    Lamb, James M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (02) : 465 - 474
  • [7] Dosimetric Evaluation of Compressed Sensing Respiratory Gating in MRI-Guided Radiotherapy
    Charters, J.
    Abdulkadir, Y.
    O'Connell, D.
    Yang, Y.
    Lamb, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [8] Indications for Online Adaptive Radiotherapy Based On Dosimetric Consequences of Interfractional Pancreas-To-Duodenum Motion in MRI-Guided Pancreatic Radiotherapy
    Mittauer, K.
    Rosenberg, S.
    Geurts, M.
    Bassetti, M.
    Chen, I.
    Henke, L.
    Olsen, J.
    Kashani, R.
    Wojcieszynski, A.
    Harari, P.
    Labby, Z.
    Hill, P.
    Paliwal, B.
    Parikh, P.
    Bayouth, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3735 - 3736
  • [9] Dosimetric evaluation of a global motion model for MRI-guided radiotherapy
    Paganelli, C.
    Albertini, S.
    Iudicello, F.
    Whelan, B.
    Kipritidis, J.
    Lee, D.
    Greer, P.
    Baroni, G.
    Keall, P.
    Riboldi, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S156 - S156
  • [10] MRI-guided prostate adaptive radiotherapy - A systematic review
    McPartlin, A. J.
    Li, X. A.
    Kershaw, L. E.
    Heide, U.
    Kerkmeijere, L.
    Lawton, C.
    Mahmood, U.
    Pos, F.
    van As, N.
    van Herk, M.
    Vesprini, D.
    van Zyp, J. van der Voort
    Tree, A.
    Choudhury, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 (03) : 371 - 380