Technological trajectories as an outcome of the structure-agency interplay at the national level: Insights from emerging varieties of AI

被引:7
|
作者
Gherhes, Cristian [1 ]
Yu, Zhen [2 ]
Vorley, Tim [1 ]
Xue, Lan [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Oxford Brookes Business Sch, Oxford OX3 0BP, Oxon, England
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Govt, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Inst AI Int Governance, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Structure; -agency; Institutions; Institutional work; Emerging technologies; Artificial intelligence; INNOVATION SYSTEMS; INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP; DEVELOPMENT POLICY; PATH CREATION; KNOWLEDGE; TRANSITIONS; POWER; LEGITIMATION; FRAMEWORK; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106252
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Development studies have paid less attention to the role of technological innovations and we are yet to understand how, and more importantly why, technological trajectories differ across countries. This gap becomes sharper as emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) are becoming increasingly important in addressing many world development challenges. Drawing on insights from institutional work literature, this paper develops a structure-agency interplay framework to unravel the various trajectories of emerging technologies at the national level and examines the development and diffusion of AI in Canada and China. The findings show that Canada's stable institutional environment, reinforced through institutional work by various actors, generated a national AI trajectory driven by technology development through a strong focus on scientific research and ethics, with slower organic commercialisation of AI. In China, a dynamic and loose institutional structure characterised by lax regulations, low entry barriers, and high openness to novelties has resulted in a market-driven AI trajectory focused on technology commercialisation, with domestic digital giants and the government as dominant players. National-level dynamics in formal institutions, informal institutions, technologies, and actor strategies determine heterogeneous approaches to technology development and diffusion, giving rise to varieties of technological trajectories. The levels of institutionalisation exert different forces and create different spaces for institutional work across different geographical contexts.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Position paper on COVID-19 imaging and AI: From the clinical needs and technological challenges to initial AI solutions at the lab and national level towards a new era for AI in healthcare
    Greenspan, Hayit
    Estepar, Raul San Jose
    Niessen, Wiro J.
    Siegel, Eliot
    Nielsen, Mads
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2020, 66 (66)