Impact of Limiting Vancomycin Loading Doses in Patients With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections After Hospital Protocol Revision
被引:0
|
作者:
Raley, Alec R.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
Univ Alabama Birmingham, UAB Hosp, Dept Pharm, 619 19th St South, Birmingham, AL 35249 USAUniv Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
Raley, Alec R.
[1
,2
]
Brown, Matthew L.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USAUniv Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
Brown, Matthew L.
[1
]
Frawley, Morgan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USAUniv Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
Frawley, Morgan
[1
]
Oster, Robert A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USAUniv Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
Oster, Robert A.
[1
]
Edwards, William Seth
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USAUniv Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
Edwards, William Seth
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, UAB Hosp, Dept Pharm, 619 19th St South, Birmingham, AL 35249 USA
Background: Vancomycin loading doses are commonly used to quickly attain target serum concentrations; however, data supporting their effect on clinical patient outcomes is limited. In April 2020, our institution revised our pharmacist-driven vancomycin dosing protocol to reserve loading doses for hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected serious methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Prior to the protocol update, all patients treated with vancomycin at our institution received a weight-based loading dose. The purpose of this study is to assess clinical efficacy and safety outcomes related to the use of vancomycin loading doses. Methods: A retrospective, quasi-experimental study was performed to compare clinical outcomes in adult patients treated with vancomycin for laboratory-confirmed MRSA infections. Patients who received vancomycin therapy prior to our institution's vancomycin dosing protocol revisions (pre-intervention) were compared to patients who received vancomycin after the revisions (post-intervention). The primary outcome was all-cause, inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included persistent signs and symptoms of infection =5 days after vancomycin initiation, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. Results: A total of 122 patients (63 pre-intervention patients and 59 post-intervention patients) were included. Receipt of a vancomycin loading dose did not impact the rate of inpatient mortality (4.76%vs 6.78%; OR 1.46, 95% CI [0.31, 6.79]). All secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups, including persistent signs and symptoms of infection, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. Conclusions: Routine use of vancomycin loading doses is not associated with improved outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with MRSA infections.