Thriving in management innovation: an institutional perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Khosravi, Pouria [1 ]
Newton, Cameron [1 ]
Rezvani, Azadeh [2 ]
Ghanbarzadeh, Reza [3 ]
Akbari, Morteza [4 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, Australia
[3] Southern Cross Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Gold Coast, Australia
[4] Univ Tehran, Fac Entrepreneurship, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Institutional pressures; Absorptive capacity; Organisational innovation; Management innovation; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; MODERATING ROLE; MEDIATING ROLE; ADOPTION; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; PRESSURES; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1108/EJIM-09-2022-0524
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeManagement innovation is one of the most vital practices underpinning economic growth and is considered to be one of the fundamental components of gaining a superior business position in market conditions that are continually fluctuating. Drawing upon neo-institutional theory as well as absorptive capacity, the current empirical study unpacks the relationships between external institutional forces (i.e. regulative, mimetic and normative pressures) and management innovation through investigating the role of absorptive capacity as a mediator.Design/methodology/approachThe research model is tested using survey data from Australian organisations. The study used Partial Least Squares (PLS), a component-based structural equation modelling (SEM) method, in order to perform the data analysis.FindingsThe results confirm that the various dimensions of institutional forces have diverse influences on management innovation. The authors found mimetic and normative pressures have positive influences on realised and potential absorptive capacity of an organisation. In addition, realised absorptive capacity mediates the relations between institutional forces and management innovation.Originality/valueDissimilar to preceding studies, this research shows that organisations not only innovate to pursue higher performance but sometimes strive for legitimacy. In addition, the significant associations between absorptive capacity and management innovation and the mediation role clearly signify that institutional forces and absorptive capacity play significant roles in the adoption of management innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:2886 / 2904
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INNOVATION IS THRIVING
    HOUGH, WE
    EDN, 1994, 39 (04) : 19 - 19
  • [2] Thriving in future work: knowledge management and innovation perspectives
    Jiang, Zhou
    Huo, Meng-Long
    Jones, Janice
    Cheng, Zhiming
    Manoharan, Ashokkumar
    Spoehr, John
    KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2025, 23 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [3] Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective
    Hinings, Bob
    Gegenhuber, Thomas
    Greenwood, Royston
    INFORMATION AND ORGANIZATION, 2018, 28 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [4] Capacities for Institutional Innovation: A Complexity Perspective
    Woodhill, Jim
    IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2010, 41 (03): : 47 - 59
  • [5] Thriving through innovation
    Moschetto, Marc
    CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2008, 55 (02) : 2 - 2
  • [6] Innovation Ecosystem Emergence Barriers: Institutional Perspective
    Almpanopoulou, Argyro
    Ritala, Paavo
    Blomqvist, Kirsimarja
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 52ND ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, : 6357 - 6366
  • [7] New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation
    Lounsbury, Michael
    Crumley, Ellen T.
    ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2007, 28 (07) : 993 - 1012
  • [8] A Thriving Innovation Ecosystem
    Buderi, Robert
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 2022, 110 (04) : 251 - 252
  • [9] Institutional Innovation of Water Resources Management
    Liu, Fang
    Miao, Yinghui
    Miao, Wang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH (ICEEMR 2018), 2018, 182 : 179 - 183
  • [10] Polycentrism: Institutional Innovation in Regional Management?
    Kluvankova-Oravska, Tatiana
    Finka, Maros
    Jilkova, Jirina
    EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2011, 59 (10): : 1050 - 1066