Resurfacing History and Volcanic Activity of Venus

被引:17
|
作者
Herrick, Robert R. [1 ]
Bjonnes, Evan T. [2 ]
Carter, Lynn M. [3 ]
Gerya, Taras [4 ]
Ghail, Richard C. [5 ]
Gillmann, Cedric [4 ,6 ]
Gilmore, Martha [7 ]
Hensley, Scott [8 ]
Ivanov, Mikhail A. [9 ]
Izenberg, Noam R. [10 ]
Mueller, Nils T. [11 ]
O'Rourke, Joseph G. [12 ]
Rolf, Tobias [13 ,14 ]
Smrekar, Suzanne E. [8 ]
Weller, Matthew B. [2 ,15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Geophys Inst, Fairbanks, AK 99775 USA
[2] Lunar & Planetary Inst, 3600 Bay Area Blvd, Houston, TX 77058 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Lunar & Planetary Lab, 1629 E Univ Blvd, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Geophys, H 9-2,Sonneggstr 5, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Royal Holloway Univ London, Dept Earth Sci, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
[6] Rice Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Planetary Sci, MS-126,6100 Main St, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[7] Wesleyan Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, 265 Church St, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
[8] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[9] Russian Acad Sci, Vernadsky Inst Geochem & Analyt Chem, Lab Comparat Planetol, Kosygin St, Moscow 119991, Russia
[10] Johns Hopkins Univ, Atmospheres & Ionospheres Grp, Space Explorat Sect, Appl Phys Lab, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723 USA
[11] German Aerosp Ctr DLR eV, Inst Planetary Res, Dept Planetary Phys, Rutherfordstr 2, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
[12] Arizona State Univ, Sch Earth & Space Explorat, Tempe, AZ USA
[13] Univ Oslo, Ctr Earth Evolut & Dynam CEED, POB 1028 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
[14] Univ Munster, Inst Geophys, Corrensstr 24, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[15] Brown Univ, Dept Earth Environm & Planetary Sci, 324 Brook St, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
Venus; Venus volcanism; Venus geology; Venus resurfacing history; GLOBAL STRATIGRAPHY; GEOLOGIC HISTORY; INITIAL ANALYSIS; IMPACT CRATERS; LAVA FLOWS; SURFACE; CONSTRAINTS; MANTLE; REGIO; ATMOSPHERE;
D O I
10.1007/s11214-023-00966-y
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Photogeologic principles can be used to suggest possible sequences of events that result in the present planetary surface. The most common method of evaluating the absolute age of a planetary surface remotely is to count the number of impact craters that have occurred after the surface formed, with the assumption that the craters occur in a spatially random fashion over time. Using additional assumptions, craters that have been partially modified by later geologic activity can be used to assess the time frames for an interpreted sequence of events. The total number of craters on Venus is low and the spatial distribution taken by itself is nearly indistinguishable from random. The overall implication is that the Venusian surface is much closer to Earth in its youthfulness than the other, smaller inner solar system bodies. There are differing interpretations of the extent to which volcanism and tectonics have modified the craters and of the regional and global sequences of geologic events. Consequently, a spectrum of global resurfacing views has emerged. These range from a planet that has evolved to have limited current volcanism and tectonics concentrated in a few zones to a planet with Earth-like levels of activity occurring everywhere at similar rates but in different ways. Analyses of the geologic record have provided observations that are challenging to reconcile with either of the endmember views. The interpretation of a global evolution with time in the nature of geologic activity relies on assumptions that have been challenged, but there are other observations of areally extensive short-lived features such as canali that are challenging to reconcile with a view of different regions evolving independently. Future data, especially high-resolution imaging and topography, can provide the details to resolve some of the issues. These different global-evolution viewpoints must tie to assessments of present-day volcanic and tectonic activity levels that can be made with the data from upcoming missions.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resurfacing History and Volcanic Activity of Venus
    Robert R. Herrick
    Evan T. Bjonnes
    Lynn M. Carter
    Taras Gerya
    Richard C. Ghail
    Cédric Gillmann
    Martha Gilmore
    Scott Hensley
    Mikhail A. Ivanov
    Noam R. Izenberg
    Nils T. Mueller
    Joseph G. O’Rourke
    Tobias Rolf
    Suzanne E. Smrekar
    Matthew B. Weller
    Space Science Reviews, 2023, 219
  • [2] RESURFACING HISTORY OF VENUS
    HERRICK, RR
    GEOLOGY, 1994, 22 (08) : 703 - 706
  • [3] IMPACT CRATERS AND VENUS RESURFACING HISTORY
    PHILLIPS, RJ
    RAUBERTAS, RF
    ARVIDSON, RE
    SARKAR, IC
    HERRICK, RR
    IZENBERG, N
    GRIMM, RE
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 1992, 97 (E10) : 15923 - +
  • [4] IMPACT CRATER DENSITIES ON VOLCANOS AND CORONAE ON VENUS - IMPLICATIONS FOR VOLCANIC RESURFACING
    NAMIKI, N
    SOLOMON, SC
    SCIENCE, 1994, 265 (5174) : 929 - 933
  • [5] Long-lived volcanic resurfacing of Venus driven by early collisions
    Simone Marchi
    Raluca Rufu
    Jun Korenaga
    Nature Astronomy, 2023, 7 : 1180 - 1187
  • [6] Long-lived volcanic resurfacing of Venus driven by early collisions
    Marchi, Simone
    Rufu, Raluca
    Korenaga, Jun
    NATURE ASTRONOMY, 2023, 7 (10) : 1180 - 1187
  • [7] Resurfacing on Venus
    Romeo, I.
    Turcotte, D. L.
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2010, 58 (10) : 1374 - 1380
  • [8] Implications of Anomalous Crustal Provinces for Venus' Resurfacing History
    Karlsson, R. V. M. K.
    Cheng, K. W.
    Crameri, F.
    Rolf, T.
    Uppalapati, S.
    Werner, S. C.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 2020, 125 (10)
  • [9] The frequency-area distribution of volcanic units on Venus: Implications for planetary resurfacing
    Romeo, I.
    Turcotte, D. L.
    ICARUS, 2009, 203 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [10] Impact crater densities on volcanoes and coronae on venus. Implications for volcanic resurfacing
    Namiki, N.
    Solomon, S.C.
    Science, 1994, 265 (5174)