A stronger memory for the perpetrator may attenuate effects of the identification procedure on eyewitness accuracy

被引:6
|
作者
Carlson, Curt A. [1 ]
Lockamyeir, Robert F. [2 ]
Wooten, Alex R. [3 ]
Jones, Alyssa R. [4 ]
Carlson, Maria A. [1 ]
Hemby, Jacob A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ Commerce, Dept Psychol, Commerce, TX 75428 USA
[2] State Univ New York Oneonta, Dept Psychol, Oneonta, NY USA
[3] Hollins Univ, Dept Psychol, Roanoke, VA USA
[4] North Carolina Wesleyan Univ, Dept Psychol, Rocky Mount, NC USA
关键词
eyewitness identification; filler similarity; lineup size; memory strength; showups; SUSPECT-FILLER SIMILARITY; LINEUP PRESENTATION; RETENTION INTERVAL; EXPOSURE DURATION; RECOGNITION; DECISIONS; CONFIDENCE; TIME; METAANALYSIS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1002/acp.4045
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The identification procedure can greatly affect eyewitness performance, but this may be contingent upon a relatively weak memory for the perpetrator. In a large preregistered experiment (N = 13,728), we manipulated memory strength and tested participants with a target-present or -absent showup or lineup (size 3 or 6). All fillers were description-matched but were of low or high similarity with the target. We replicated the advantage of fair simultaneous lineups over showups and the advantage of low- over high-similarity fillers when memory for the perpetrator's face was weaker (short exposure duration), but both effects were significantly reduced when memory was stronger. There was no effect of lineup size regardless of memory strength or filler similarity. We conclude that some recommendations to police may be more robust than others across changes in estimator variables such as memory strength and that more research is needed on interactions between estimator and system variables.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 432
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Can Familiarity Between an Adolescent Eyewitness and a Perpetrator Influence Identification Accuracy?
    Chelsea L. Sheahan
    Joanna D. Pozzulo
    Emily Pica
    Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2022, 37 : 325 - 338
  • [2] Can Familiarity Between an Adolescent Eyewitness and a Perpetrator Influence Identification Accuracy?
    Sheahan, Chelsea L.
    Pozzulo, Joanna D.
    Pica, Emily
    JOURNAL OF POLICE AND CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 37 (02) : 325 - 338
  • [3] Effects of Experiencing the Eyewitness Identification Procedure on Juror Decisions
    Duckworth T.S.
    Kreiner D.S.
    Stark-Wroblewski K.
    Marsh P.A.
    Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2011, 26 (1) : 11 - 19
  • [4] Change blindness and eyewitness identification: Effects on accuracy and confidence
    Fitzgerald, Ryan J.
    Oriet, Chris
    Price, Heather L.
    LEGAL AND CRIMINOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 21 (01) : 189 - 201
  • [5] EFFECTS OF INTERPOLATED MUGSHOT EXPOSURE ON ACCURACY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION
    DAVIES, G
    SHEPHERD, J
    ELLIS, H
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 64 (02) : 232 - 237
  • [6] Effects of administrator-witness, contact on eyewitness identification accuracy
    Haw, RM
    Fisher, RP
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (06) : 1106 - 1112
  • [7] Double Exposure: The Effects of Repeated Identification Lineups on Eyewitness Accuracy
    Steblay, Nancy K.
    Tix, Robert W.
    Benson, Samantha L.
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 27 (05) : 644 - 654
  • [8] The masked villain: the effects of facial masking, distance, lighting, and eyewitness age on eyewitness identification accuracy
    Nyman, Thomas J.
    Korkman, Julia
    Lampinen, James Michael
    Antfolk, Jan
    Santtila, Pekka
    PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2025, 31 (03) : 332 - 370
  • [9] The masked villain: the effects of facial masking, distance, lighting, and eyewitness age on eyewitness identification accuracy
    Nyman, Thomas J.
    Korkman, Julia
    Lampinen, James Michael
    Antfolk, Jan
    Santtila, Pekka
    PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2023,
  • [10] Practice and feedback effects on the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness memory
    Perfect, TJ
    Hollins, TS
    Hunt, ALR
    MEMORY, 2000, 8 (04) : 235 - 244