共 50 条
Efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in COVID-19 management: a systematic review and meta-analysis
被引:20
|作者:
Deng, Jiawen
[1
]
Rayner, Daniel
[2
]
Ramaraju, Harikrishnaa B.
[3
]
Abbas, Umaima
[4
]
Garcia, Cristian
[1
]
Heybati, Kiyan
[5
]
Zhou, Fangwen
[6
]
Huang, Emma
[7
]
Park, Ye-Jean
[1
]
Moskalyk, Myron
[6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, 1 Kings Coll Cir, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Richmond, VA USA
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Windsor Campus, Windsor, ON, Canada
[5] Mayo Clin, Mayo Clin Rochester, Alix Sch Med, Rochester, MN USA
[6] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词:
COVID-19;
Fluvoxamine;
Meta-analysis;
SARS-CoV-2;
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor;
ANTIDEPRESSANTS;
FLUVOXAMINE;
GRADE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cmi.2023.01.010
中图分类号:
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号:
100401 ;
摘要:
Background: The efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in the treatment of acute COVID-19 is still under investigation, with conflicting results reported from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Different dosing regimens may have contributed to the contradictory findings. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SSRIs and the effect of different dosing regimens on the treatment of acute COVID-19. Data sources: Seven databases were searched from January 2020 to December 2022. Trial registries, previous reviews, and preprint servers were hand-searched. Study eligibility criteria: RCTs and observational studies with no language restrictions. Participants: COVID-19 inpatients/outpatients. Interventions: SSRIs prescribed after diagnosis were compared against a placebo or standard of care. Assessment of risk of bias: Risk of bias was rated using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Ran-domized Trials version 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions. Methods of data synthesis: Outcomes were mortality, hospitalization, composite of hospitalization/ emergency room visits, hypoxemia, requirement for supplemental oxygen, ventilator support, and serious adverse events. RCT data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Observational findings were narratively described. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of SSRI dose, and sensitivity analyses were performed excluding studies with a high risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Six RCTs (N = 4197) and five observational studies (N = 1156) were included. Meta-analyses associated fluvoxamine with reduced mortality (risk ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63-0.82) and hospitalization (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99) on the basis of moderate quality of evidence. Medium-dose fluvoxamine (100 mg twice a day) was associated with reduced mortality, hospitalization, and composite of hospitali-zation/emergency room visits, but low-dose fluvoxamine (50 mg twice a day) was not. Fluvoxamine was not associated with increased serious adverse events. Observational studies support the use of fluvoxamine and highlight fluoxetine as a possible alternative to SSRIs for the treatment of COVID-19. Discussion: Fluvoxamine remains a candidate pharmacotherapy for treating COVID-19 in outpatients. Medium-dose fluvoxamine may be preferable over low-dose fluvoxamine. Jiawen Deng, Clin Microbiol Infect 2023;29:578 (c) 2023 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文