The profunda artery perforators: Anatomical study and radiological findings using computed tomography angiography in patients undergoing PAP flap breast reconstruction

被引:1
|
作者
Sonda, Regina [1 ,2 ]
Atzeni, Matteo [2 ]
Martini, Federica [3 ,4 ]
Kohlscheen, Eva [1 ]
Monticelli, Andrea [1 ]
-Preis, Franz W. Baruffaldi [3 ,4 ]
Saba, Luca [5 ]
Bassetto, Franco [1 ]
Tiengo, Cesare [1 ]
Figus, Andrea [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Padua Univ Hosp, Neurosci Dept, Clin Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Cagliari, Univ Hosp Duilio Casula, Fac Med & Surg, Dept Surg Sci,Plast Surg & Microsurg Unit, Cagliari, Italy
[3] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Dept Plast Surg, Milan, Italy
[4] Osped Niguarda Ca Granda, Burn Unit, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Cagliari, Univ Hosp Duilio Casula, Dept Radiol, Clin Radiodiagnost, Cagliari, Italy
[6] AOU Cagliari, Plast Surg & Micro Surg Unit, SS 554 Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
关键词
PAP flap; Breast reconstruction; Computed tomography angiography; SATISFACTION; EVOLUTION; POSTERIOR; REFINEMENTS; CLOSURE; DIEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.12.006
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The popularity of the profunda femoris artery perforator (PAP) flap is increasing; however, knowledge concerning the standardization of radiological findings and their clinical implications is limited. We evaluated the radiological architecture of posterior thigh perforators using Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) to identify landmarks to fa- cilitate flap dissection. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 35 patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a PAP flap. The preoperative CTA scans were analyzed, and the perforator characteristics were evaluated. The perforators were mapped using a Cartesian coordinate system. Data were normalized by anatomical landmarks and overlapped. Perioperative and postoperative results were analyzed. Radiological and intraoperative were compared. Results: Two CTA scans were excluded; 66 thighs were examined. The mean perforator number was 3.2. The mean diameter of chosen perforators was 2.7 mm (DS +/- 0.6 mm) at the origin, 2.2 mm (DS +/- 0.4 mm) at the adductor space midpoint, and 1.7 mm (DS +/- 0.3 mm) at the deep fascia. The mean adipose tissue thickness was 3.35 cm (DS +/- 0.94) at the deep fascia and 3.59 cm (DS +/- 1.19) at the adductor space midpoint. Intraoperatively, the perforator was located 3.22 cm (DS +/- 0.87) from the posterior border of the gracilis muscle and 8.98 cm (DS +/- 1.44) from the inferior gluteal crease. A radiological area located 9.33 cm (DS +/- 4.81) from the y-axis and 7.48 cm (DS +/- 1.88) from the x-axis was identified. Conclusions: CTA using the volume -rendering technique is a valuable method to study in vivo the radiological anatomy of the posterior thigh perforators. (c) 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preoperative estimation of vertical profunda artery perforator flap weight using computed tomography angiography for breast reconstruction
    Matsumine, Hajime
    Shimizu, Haruka
    Niimi, Yosuke
    MICROSURGERY, 2023, 43 (04) : 357 - 364
  • [2] Estimation of Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Weight Using Preoperative Computed Tomography Angiography
    Greige, Nicolas
    Nash, David
    Salibian, Ara A.
    Sultan, Steven M.
    Ricci, Joseph A.
    Thanik, Vishal D.
    Weichman, Katie E.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2020, 36 (09) : 645 - 650
  • [3] Lumbar artery perforators: an anatomical study based on computed tomographic angiography imaging
    Sommeling, Casper Emile
    Colebunders, Britt
    Pardon, Heleen E.
    Stillaert, Filip B.
    Blondeel, Phillip N.
    Van Landuyt, Koenraad
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2017, 117 (04) : 223 - 226
  • [4] A radioanatomic study of the internal mammary artery and its perforators using multidetector computed tomography angiography
    Tan, Onder
    Yuce, Ihsan
    Aydin, Osman Enver
    Kantarci, Mecit
    MICROSURGERY, 2014, 34 (04) : 277 - 282
  • [5] Potential of the Thoracoepigastric Vein as a Drainage Vein in Breast Reconstruction With a Free Flap: An Anatomical Study Using Computed Tomography
    Nemoto, Hitoshi
    Nakatsuka, Kengo
    Morita, Daiki
    Seki, Yukio
    Imagawa, Kotaro
    Tsunoda, Yotaro
    Komaba, Chieko
    Hanai, Ushio
    MICROSURGERY, 2024, 44 (06)
  • [6] Expanding the use of internal mammary artery perforators as a recipient vessel in free tissue transfer: An anatomical analysis by computed tomography angiography in breast cancer patients
    Shin, Dongwoo
    Sung, Ki Wook
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Park, Tae Hwan
    Song, Seung Yong
    Roh, Tai Suk
    Lew, Dae Hyun
    Lee, Dong Won
    MICROSURGERY, 2019, 39 (06) : 509 - 514
  • [7] Anatomic study of the profunda artery perforators by multidetector CT scanner and clinical use of the banana-shaped flap design for breast reconstruction
    Zeltzer, Assaf A.
    Waked, Karl
    Brussaard, Carola
    Giunta, Gabriele
    De Baerdemaeker, Randy
    Hamdi, Moustapha
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 125 (02) : 123 - 133
  • [8] Clinical study of peroneal artery perforators with computed tomographic angiography: implications for fibular flap harvest
    Ribuffo, Diego
    Atzeni, Matteo
    Saba, Luca
    Guerra, Maristella
    Mallarini, Giorgio
    Proto, Ernesto Biagio
    Grinsell, Damien
    Ashton, Mark W.
    Rozen, Warren M.
    SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2010, 32 (04) : 329 - 334
  • [9] Clinical study of peroneal artery perforators with computed tomographic angiography: implications for fibular flap harvest
    Diego Ribuffo
    Matteo Atzeni
    Luca Saba
    Maristella Guerra
    Giorgio Mallarini
    Ernesto Biagio Proto
    Damien Grinsell
    Mark W. Ashton
    Warren M. Rozen
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2010, 32 : 329 - 334
  • [10] Inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap versus profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap as an alternative option for free autologous breast reconstruction
    Murphy, Declan C.
    Razzano, Sergio
    Wade, Ryckie G.
    Haywood, Richard M.
    Figus, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (03): : 1100 - 1107