Ecotourism branding in protected areas of Iran: Using an efficient hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method model

被引:4
|
作者
Tajer, Elnaz [1 ]
Demir, Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Bursa Tech Univ, Fac Forestry, Dept Landscape Architecture, Bursa, Turkiye
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Best and Worst Method (BWM); ecotourism branding of protected areas; hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM); Iran; quantitative SWOT analysis; NATIONAL-PARK DJERDAP; SWOT; PRIORITIZATION; TOURISM; STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK; ANP;
D O I
10.1002/jtr.2639
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Ecotourism, as a nature-based sustainable tourism, raises awareness about the protection of natural and cultural landscape values. This study aims to determine the ecotourism criteria to develop strategies for a sustainable ecotourism branding in Golestan, located in the northeast of Iran. To reach this aim, Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) analysis, multi-criteria decision-making methods consisting of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Best and Worst Method (BWM) were integrated. The most appropriate ecotourism strategies for the branding of the study area were ranked according to their priorities. The results of this study reveal that among the 5 main and 20 sub ecotourism criteria, "having natural protected areas," which is an opportunity, and "having ecological values," which is a strength, were determined as the highest priority strategies for ecotourism branding. The methods and results of this quantitative-based research present an exemplary hybrid model that prioritizes the strategies required for branding ecotourism in similar protected areas.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Applying Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Prioritizing Strategies for Developing Protected Natural Areas and Their Ecotourism: the Case of Uvac, Serbia
    Dobricic, Milica
    Sljivovic, Mladen
    Cvetkovic, Milena
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (02): : 1083 - 1090
  • [2] A critical review of multi-criteria decision making in protected areas
    de Castro, Monica
    Urios, Vicente
    ECONOMIA AGRARIA Y RECURSOS NATURALES, 2016, 16 (02): : 89 - 109
  • [3] The stratified multi-criteria decision-making method
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 115 - 123
  • [4] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation
    Amiri, M.
    Zandieh, M.
    Soltani, R.
    Vahdani, B.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (10) : 12314 - 12322
  • [5] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for optimal coal blending
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Mitra, Ankan
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2019, 14 (02) : 339 - 359
  • [6] Healthcare Sustainability Evaluation Using a Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Erjaee, Asma
    Hendiani, Sepehr
    Moradi, Shohreh
    Bagherpour, Morteza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 24 (02) : 1182 - 1202
  • [7] Healthcare Sustainability Evaluation Using a Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Asma Erjaee
    Sepehr Hendiani
    Shohreh Moradi
    Morteza Bagherpour
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2022, 24 : 1182 - 1202
  • [8] An efficient composite cloud service model using multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Saha, Munmun
    Panda, Sanjaya Kumar
    Panigrahi, Suvasini
    Taniar, David
    JOURNAL OF SUPERCOMPUTING, 2023, 79 (08): : 8754 - 8788
  • [9] An efficient composite cloud service model using multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Munmun Saha
    Sanjaya Kumar Panda
    Suvasini Panigrahi
    David Taniar
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, 79 : 8754 - 8788
  • [10] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +