Detection and Quantification of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Fecal Samples Using Digital Droplet PCR in Comparison with Real-Time PCR

被引:10
|
作者
Feng, Junxia [1 ]
Cui, Xiaohu [1 ]
Du, Bing [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Hanqing [1 ]
Feng, Yanling [1 ]
Cui, Jinghua [1 ]
Yan, Chao [1 ]
Gan, Lin [1 ]
Fan, Zheng [1 ]
Fu, Tongtong [1 ]
Xu, Ziying [1 ]
Yu, Zihui [1 ]
Zhang, Rui [1 ]
Du, Shuheng [1 ]
Tian, Ziyan [1 ]
Zhang, Qun [1 ]
Xue, Guanhua [1 ]
Yuan, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Inst Pediat, Dept Bacteriol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Biol Sci, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM | 2023年 / 11卷 / 04期
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
droplet digital PCR; real-time PCR; Klebsiella pneumoniae; quantification; SYSTEM; VIRUS; GENES; DNA;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.04249-22
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This study aimed to develop a rapid and sensitive droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for the specific detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae in fecal samples, and to evaluate its application in the clinic by comparison with real-time PCR assay and conventional microbial culture. Specific primers and a probe targeting the K. pneumoniae hemolysin (khe) gene were designed. Thirteen other pathogens were used to evaluate the specificity of the primers and probe. A recombinant plasmid containing the khe gene was constructed and used to assess the sensitivity, repeatability, and reproducibility of the ddPCR. Clinical fecal samples (n = 103) were collected and tested by the ddPCR, real-time PCR, and conventional microbial culture methods. The detection limit of ddPCR for K. pneumoniae was 1.1 copies/mu L, about a 10-fold increase in sensitivity compared with real-time PCR. The ddPCR was negative for the 13 pathogens other than K. pneumoniae, confirming its high specificity. Clinical fecal samples gave a higher rate of positivity in the K. pneumoniae ddPCR assay than in analysis by real-time PCR or conventional culture. ddPCR also showed less inhibition by the inhibitor in fecal sample than real-time PCR. Thus, we established a sensitive and effective ddPCR-based assay method for K. pneumoniae. It could be a useful tool for K. pneumoniae detection in feces and may serve as a reliable method to identify causal pathogens and help guide treatment decisions.IMPORTANCE Klebsiella pneumoniae can cause a range of illnesses and has a high colonization rate in the human gut, making it crucial to develop an efficient method for detecting K. pneumoniae in fecal samples. Klebsiella pneumoniae can cause a range of illnesses and has a high colonization rate in the human gut, making it crucial to develop an efficient method for detecting K. pneumoniae in fecal samples.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR to Real-Time PCR for Quantitative Detection of Cytomegalovirus
    Hayden, R. T.
    Gu, Z.
    Ingersoll, J.
    Abdul-Ali, D.
    Shi, L.
    Pounds, S.
    Caliendo, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (02) : 540 - 546
  • [2] Construction and evaluation of reference standards for detection and quantification of Klebsiella pneumoniae using real-time PCR
    Fei-Long Sun1
    2.School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering
    3.Institute of Environment and Health
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2010, 22 (03) : 183 - 187
  • [3] Comparison of droplet digital PCR to real-time PCR for quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA
    Tang, Hui
    Cai, Qingchun
    Li, Hu
    Hu, Peng
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2016, 80 (11) : 2159 - 2164
  • [4] Comparison of real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR for the detection of Xylella fastidiosa in plants
    Dupas, Enora
    Legendre, Bruno
    Olivier, Valerie
    Poliakoff, Francoise
    Manceau, Charles
    Cunty, Amandine
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2019, 162 : 86 - 95
  • [5] Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR
    Christopher M Hindson
    John R Chevillet
    Hilary A Briggs
    Emily N Gallichotte
    Ingrid K Ruf
    Benjamin J Hindson
    Robert L Vessella
    Muneesh Tewari
    Nature Methods, 2013, 10 : 1003 - 1005
  • [6] Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR
    Hindson, Christopher M.
    Chevillet, John R.
    Briggs, Hilary A.
    Gallichotte, Emily N.
    Ruf, Ingrid K.
    Hindson, Benjamin J.
    Vessella, Robert L.
    Tewari, Muneesh
    NATURE METHODS, 2013, 10 (10) : 1003 - +
  • [7] Quantification of Lentiviral Vectors Using Quantitative Real-Time PCR vs Digital Droplet PCR
    Dean, Rebecca J.
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2022, 30 (04) : 356 - 356
  • [8] Comparison between RT droplet digital PCR and RT real-time PCR for quantification of noroviruses in oysters
    Persson, Sofia
    Eriksson, Ronnie
    Lowther, James
    Ellstrom, Patrik
    Simonsson, Magnus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 284 : 73 - 83
  • [9] Comparison of droplet digital PCR vs real-time PCR for Yersinia enterocolitica detection in vegetables
    Cristiano, D.
    Peruzy, M. F.
    Aponte, M.
    Mancusi, A.
    Proroga, Y. T. R.
    Capuano, F.
    Murru, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 354
  • [10] Method optimization for the detection of chimerism by real-time PCR and droplet digital PCR
    Lambrescu, I. M.
    Ionescu, V. S.
    Gaina, G.
    Popa, A.
    Niculite, C.
    Cismasiu, V. B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S1358 - S1358