Evaluating precipitation distributions at regional scales: a benchmarking framework and application to CMIP5 and 6 models

被引:8
|
作者
Ahn, Min-Seop [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ullrich, Paul A. [1 ,4 ]
Gleckler, Peter J. [1 ]
Lee, Jiwoo [1 ]
Ordonez, Ana C. [1 ]
Pendergrass, Angeline G. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, PCMDI, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr, GMAO, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, ESSIC, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Earth & Atmospher Sci, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, CGD, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
RESOLUTION; TEMPERATURE; STATISTICS; INTENSITY; SATELLITE; SYSTEM; TRMM;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-16-3927-2023
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
As the resolution of global Earth system models increases, regional-scale evaluations are becoming ever more important. This study presents a framework for quantifying precipitation distributions at regional scales and applies it to evaluate Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) 5 and 6 models. We employ the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) sixth assessment report (AR6) climate reference regions over land and propose refinements to the oceanic regions based on the homogeneity of precipitation distribution characteristics. The homogeneous regions are identified as heavy-, moderate-, and light-precipitating areas by K-means clustering of Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) version 6 final run product (IMERG) precipitation frequency and amount distributions. With the global domain partitioned into 62 regions, including 46 land and 16 ocean regions, we apply 10 established precipitation distribution metrics. The collection includes metrics focused on the maximum peak, lower 10th percentile, and upper 90th percentile in precipitation amount and frequency distributions; the similarity between observed and modeled frequency distributions; an unevenness measure based on cumulative amount; average total intensity on all days with precipitation; and number of precipitating days each year. We apply our framework to 25 CMIP5 and 41 CMIP6 models, as well as six observation-based products of daily precipitation. Our results indicate that many CMIP5 and 6 models substantially overestimate the observed light-precipitation amount and frequency, as well as the number of precipitating days, especially over midlatitude regions outside of some land regions in the Americas and Eurasia. Improvement from CMIP5 to 6 is shown in some regions, especially in midlatitude regions, but it is not evident globally, and over the tropics most metrics point toward degradation.
引用
收藏
页码:3927 / 3951
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seasonal and regional biases in CMIP5 precipitation simulations
    Liu, Zhu
    Mehran, Ali
    Phillips, Thomas J.
    AghaKouchak, Amir
    CLIMATE RESEARCH, 2014, 60 (01) : 35 - 50
  • [2] Precipitation Extremes in CMIP5 Simulations on Different Time Scales
    Zhang, Huan
    Fraedrich, Klaus
    Blender, Richard
    Zhu, Xiuhua
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2013, 14 (03) : 923 - 928
  • [3] Evaluating Arctic warming mechanisms in CMIP5 models
    Franzke, Christian L. E.
    Lee, Sukyoung
    Feldstein, Steven B.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2017, 48 (9-10) : 3247 - 3260
  • [4] Annual and seasonal mean tropical and subtropical precipitation bias in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Li, J-L F.
    Xu, Kuan-Man
    Richardson, Mark
    Lee, Wei-Liang
    Jiang, J. H.
    Yu, Jia-Yuh
    Wang, Yi-Hui
    Fetzer, Eric
    Wang, Li-Chiao
    Stephens, Graeme
    Liang, Hsin-Chien
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [5] Regional, Very Heavy Daily Precipitation in CMIP5 Simulations
    Kawazoe, Sho
    Gutowski, William J., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2013, 14 (04) : 1228 - 1242
  • [6] Evaluating wind extremes in CMIP5 climate models
    Devashish Kumar
    Vimal Mishra
    Auroop R. Ganguly
    Climate Dynamics, 2015, 45 : 441 - 453
  • [7] Evaluating wind extremes in CMIP5 climate models
    Kumar, Devashish
    Mishra, Vimal
    Ganguly, Auroop R.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2015, 45 (1-2) : 441 - 453
  • [8] Evaluating Arctic warming mechanisms in CMIP5 models
    Christian L. E. Franzke
    Sukyoung Lee
    Steven B. Feldstein
    Climate Dynamics, 2017, 48 : 3247 - 3260
  • [9] Added value of CMIP6 models over CMIP5 models in simulating the climatological precipitation extremes in China
    Luo, Neng
    Guo, Yan
    Chou, Jieming
    Gao, Zhibo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (02) : 1148 - 1164
  • [10] Quantifying internally generated and externally forced climate signals at regional scales in CMIP5 models
    Lyu, Kewei
    Zhang, Xuebin
    Church, John A.
    Hu, Jianyu
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 42 (21) : 9394 - 9403