Gender bias in ecosystem restoration: from science to practice

被引:4
|
作者
Cruz-Alonso, Veronica [1 ,2 ]
Martinez-Baroja, Loreto [3 ,4 ]
Marques, Laura [5 ,6 ]
Rodriguez-Una, Asun [7 ,8 ]
Rohrer, Zoe [9 ]
Monteagudo, Navila [3 ]
Velado-Alonso, Elena [10 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Design, Dept Landscape Architecture, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Fdn Int Restaurac Ecosistemas, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Alcala, Dept Ciencias Vida, Forest Ecol & Restorat Grp FORECO, Alcala De Henares, Spain
[4] Utah State Univ, Coll Nat Resources, Dept Wildland Resources, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[5] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Inst Agr Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[6] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
[7] Univ Cambridge, Dept Plant Sci, Cambridge, England
[8] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Leioa, Spain
[9] Cinclus Soluc SL, Seville, Spain
[10] Estn Biol Donana CSIC, Seville, Spain
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
equality; gender bias; gender gap; leadership; leaky pipeline; women in science; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; WOMEN; INEQUALITY; GAP; AUTHORSHIP; PIPELINE; LAST;
D O I
10.1111/rec.13815
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The declaration of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2020-2030 has established the need to focus on human rights in restoration initiatives, including gender equality. Although this goal raises a need to monitor gender biases on ecosystem restoration, we still lack basic gender information and evaluations on the current situation. The main purpose of this study is to analyze gender bias in ecosystem restoration covering three dimensions: research, outreach, and practice. We used scientific publications from the Restoration Ecology journal, mentions of these articles in Altmetric Explorer and Twitter, and projects from the Society for Ecological Restoration's database. First, we study gender bias among people leading ecosystem restoration initiatives in the three dimensions. Second, we assessed factors that could influence gender bias, including year, target ecosystem, and socioeconomic country development. Third, we analyzed whether the impact of scientific knowledge in society depends on the gender of the scientific team. Our results indicate that men were primary leaders in research, outreach, and practice initiatives in ecosystem restoration. There seems to be a trend over time toward equality in research, but gender inequality is still present in most types of ecosystems, with women leading more projects in more developed countries. The impact of scientific knowledge is independent of the author's gender, but research of male senior authors seems to reach society more easily. This broad perspective of inequality in the three dimensions can evolve toward gender equality, by applying gender approaches in restoration policies and initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cooperative Extension: A Model of Science-Practice Integration for Ecosystem Restoration
    David, Erica
    Dixon, Kingsley W.
    Menz, Myles H. M.
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 21 (05) : 410 - 417
  • [2] Ecosystem restoration with local or broad seed provenancing: Debates and perceptions in science and practice
    Torok, K.
    Valko, O.
    Deak, B.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 293
  • [3] Gender bias in European science
    Schulz, W
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2002, 80 (25) : 17 - 17
  • [4] Gender bias in European science
    Chemical and Engineering News, 2002, 80 (25):
  • [5] The role of wildlife science in wetland ecosystem restoration: Lessons from the Everglades
    Gawlik, DE
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (01) : 70 - 83
  • [6] The science and practice of river restoration
    Wohl, Ellen
    Lane, Stuart N.
    Wilcox, Andrew C.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2015, 51 (08) : 5974 - 5997
  • [7] The relevance of international restoration principles for ecosystem restoration practice in Rwanda
    Frietsch, Marina
    Fischer, Joern
    Kaplin, Beth A.
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2024, 32 (03)
  • [8] Environmental science - Aging infrastructure and ecosystem restoration
    Doyle, Martin W.
    Stanley, Emily H.
    Havlick, David G.
    Kaiser, Mark J.
    Steinbach, George
    Graf, William L.
    Galloway, Gerald E.
    Riggsbee, J. Adam
    SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (5861) : 286 - 287
  • [9] Ecosystem restoration: recent advances in theory and practice
    Jones, T. A.
    RANGELAND JOURNAL, 2017, 39 (5-6): : 417 - 430
  • [10] Ecosystem services science, practice, and policy: Perspectives from ACES, A Community on Ecosystem Services
    Shapiro, Carl
    Arthaud, Greg
    Casey, Frank
    Hogan, Dianna
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 115 : 1 - 2