Mixed-method acceptability evaluation of a co-designed bundled intervention to support communication for patients with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit during a pandemic

被引:6
|
作者
Istanboulian, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Rose, Louise [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Yunusova, Yana [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Dale, Craig [1 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Lawrence S Bloomberg Fac Nursing, 155 Coll St, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada
[2] Michael Garron Hosp, Prov Prolonged Ventilat Weaning Ctr Excellence &, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Fac Nursing Midwifery & Pall, London, England
[4] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, St Thomas Hosp, Dept Crit Care, London, England
[5] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, St Thomas Hosp, Lane Fox Clin Resp Physiol Res Ctr, London, England
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Speech Language Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Sunnybrook Res Inst Wellness Way, Harvitz Brain Sci Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Tory Trauma Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
acceptability; communication; COVID-19; intensive care units; nursing; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; ICU; STRATEGIES; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1111/nicc.12828
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background Although bundled communication interventions are recommended to address communication barriers for patients with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit (ICU) such interventions have not been evaluated in pandemic conditions. Aim To evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of a co-designed bundled intervention to support communication with adult patients with an advanced airway in ICU in pandemic conditions. Study Design Prospective, convergent mixed method design in a single centre medical-surgical ICU in Toronto, Canada between September 2021-March 2022. After the use of the co-designed bundled communication intervention quantitative data were collected from health care providers using validated acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility measures and analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were collected from providers, patients and families using semi-structured interviews and analysed using content analysis applying the theoretical framework of acceptability. Joint table analysis enabled the integration of the two data sets. Results A total of 64 (41.3%) HCPs responded to the survey: 54 (84.4%) rated the intervention acceptable; 55 (85.9%) appropriate; and 49 (76.6%) feasible for use in this context. Qualitative data (23 interviews: 13 healthcare providers, 6 families and 4 patients) and the joint table analysis extended the understanding that intervention acceptability was related to positive affective attitudes and reduced communication frustration. Appropriateness and feasibility were promoted through intervention alignment with values, ability to personalize tools, and ease of access. Recommendations to improve the acceptability included adaptation for immobilized and/or restrained patients, additional education, and integration into existing workflows. Conclusions This mixed method evaluation of a co-designed bundled intervention to support patient communication in the ICU during pandemic conditions demonstrated high rated and described acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility by participants. Relevance to Clinical Practice A co-designed communication intervention demonstrating stakeholder acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility can be implemented into clinical practice in pandemic and other infection prevention and control contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1077
页数:9
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] A co-designed health information system implementation into residential aged care: A mixed-method evaluation
    Bail, Kasia
    Merrick, Eamon
    Gibson, Diane
    Hind, Alicia
    Strickland, Karen
    Redley, Bernice
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2023, 55 (02) : 521 - 535
  • [2] Mixed-method research protocol: Development and evaluation of a nursing intervention in patients discharged from the intensive care unit
    Cuzco, Cecilia
    Castro Rebollo, Pedro
    Marin Perez, Raquel
    Nunez Delgado, Ana Isabel
    Romero Garcia, Marta
    Martinez Momblan, M. Antonia
    Estrada Reventos, Dolors
    Martinez Estalella, Gemma
    Delgado-Hito, Pilar
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (06): : 3666 - 3676
  • [3] Protocol for a mixed method acceptability evaluation of a codesigned bundled COmmunication intervention for use in the adult ICU during the COVID-19 PandEmic: the COPE study
    Istanboulian, Laura
    Rose, Louise
    Yunusova, Yana
    Dale, Craig M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [4] Acceptability, Engagement and Exploratory Outcomes and Costs of a Co-Designed Support Intervention for Children of Parents with a Mental Illness: Mixed-Methods Evaluation and Descriptive Analysis
    Bauer, A.
    Cartagena-Farias, J.
    Christiansen, H.
    Goodyear, M.
    Schamschula, M.
    Zechmeister-Koss, I
    Paul, J.
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 : S5 - S6
  • [5] Acceptability, engagement and exploratory outcomes and costs of a co-designed intervention to support children of parents with a mental illness: Mixed-methods evaluation and descriptive analysis
    Bauer, Annette
    Cartagena-Farias, Javiera
    Christiansen, Hanna
    Goodyear, Melinda
    Schamschula, Mona
    Zechmeister-Koss, Ingrid
    Paul, Jean
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 33 (05) : 1289 - 1302