Benchmarking of academic departments using data envelopment analysis (DEA)

被引:3
|
作者
Alam, Tasfiq E. [1 ]
Gonzalez, Andres D. [1 ]
Raman, Shivakumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Ind & Syst Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
Benchmarking; Resource allocation; Data envelopment analysis; Relative efficiency; Decision-support system; Investment model; HIGHER-EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS; MEASURING EFFICIENCY; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY; COLLEGE RANKINGS; PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.1108/JARHE-03-2021-0087
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose - The main objective of the paper is to develop an investment model using data envelopment analysis (DEA) that provides a decision-making framework to allocate resources efficiently, such that the relative efficiency is improved within an available investment budget. Design/methodology/approach - Firstly, DEA models are used to evaluate the efficiency of the departments relative to their peers and providing benchmarks for the less efficient departments. Secondly, the inefficiencies in departments are identified. Finally, for the less efficient departments, a decision-support system is introduced for optimizing resource allocation to improve efficiency. Findings - Five of the 18 academic departments were determined to be inefficient, and benchmark departments were found for those departments. The most prevalent causes for inefficiency were the number of undergraduate students per faculty and the number of graduate students. Results from the investment model for department 12 suggest increasing the number of faculty by 2 units and H-Index by 0.5 units, thereby, improving the relative efficiency of the department by 6.8% (88%-94%), using $290,000 out of $500,000 investment budget provided. Originality/value - When an investment budget is available, no study has used DEA to develop a decision-support framework for resource allocation in academic departments to maximize relative efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 285
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis
    Agha, Salah R.
    Kuhail, Ibrahim
    Abdelnabi, Nader
    Salem, Mahmoud
    Ghanim, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-JIEM, 2011, 4 (02): : 301 - 325
  • [2] A data envelopment analysis (DEA) model for building energy benchmarking
    Ashuri, Baabak
    Wang, Jun
    Shahandashti, Mohsen
    Baek, Minsoo
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 17 (04) : 747 - 768
  • [3] Efficiency and benchmarking of sales operators through data envelopment analysis (DEA)
    Camelo, Gustavo Rossa
    Coelho, Antonio Sergio
    Borges, Renata Massoli
    SISTEMAS & GESTAO, 2011, 6 (01): : 1 - 19
  • [4] Benchmarking freight transportation corridors and routes with data envelopment analysis (DEA)
    Melo, Isotilia Costa
    Alves Junior, Paulo Nocera
    Perico, Ana Elisa
    Serrano Guzman, Maria Gabriela
    do Nascimento Rebelatto, Daisy Aparecida
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (02) : 713 - 742
  • [6] Applying benchmarking and data envelopment analysis (DEA) techniques to irrigation districts in Spain
    Díaz, JAR
    Poyato, EC
    Luque, RL
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2004, 53 (02) : 135 - 143
  • [7] Benchmarking the rescue departments of the Austrian Red Cross using data envelopment analysis and fractional regression models
    Sommersguter-Reichmann, Margit
    Rauner, Marion S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2015, 53 (24) : 7271 - 7285
  • [8] Use of Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure the Performance Efficiency of Academic Departments
    Sirbu, Adrian
    Cimpoies, Dragos
    Racul, Anatol
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE - AGRICULTURE FOR LIFE, LIFE FOR AGRICULTURE, 2016, 10 : 578 - 585
  • [9] Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis
    Post, T
    Spronk, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 115 (03) : 472 - 487
  • [10] Benchmarking marketing productivity using data envelopment analysis
    Donthu, N
    Hershberger, EK
    Osmonbekov, T
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (11) : 1474 - 1482