Sleeve gastrectomy with one anastomosis bipartition versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: A pilot study

被引:1
|
作者
Qin, Xiaoguang [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Zhongqi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lee, Wei-Jei [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Shu-Chun [3 ]
Chen, Jung-Chien [3 ]
Wu, Guoqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Wei, Tiantian [1 ]
Huang, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated BenQ Hosp, Bariatr Med Ctr, Suzhou BenQ Med Ctr,Dept Metab, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] China Med Univ, Hsinchu Hosp, Med Weight Loss Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, 899 Ping Hai Rd, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
metabolic surgery; one-anastomosis gastric bypass; SG plus one anastomosis bipartition; OBESE-PATIENTS; EXPERIENCE; PLICATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/ases.13258
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a new recognized metabolic surgery, but the problem that we cannot screen the excluded stomach is a troubling issue in China. The emergence of sleeve gastrectomy plus one anastomosis bipartition (SG + OAB) makes us see a hope to solve this problem.Objectives: By comparing the efficacy of the two surgical methods, to evaluate whether SG + OAB surgery can solve the dilemma faced by OAGB that the excluded stomach cannot be screened.Methods: A retrospective study to compare the patients who underwent OAGB and SG + OAB was conducted. The main outcome measures were (1) operation risk, (2) weight loss, and (3) diabetes remission at 6 months.Results: This study was conducted in the bariatric/metabolic surgical center. From November 2021 to February 2022, a total of 30 patients with obesity who received SG + OAB surgery were recruited. Another matched 60 patients undergoing OAGB were recruited as control group. There was no difference in preoperative age (32.15 +/- 9.02 vs. 34.47 +/- 7.22; p = .224), female ratio (83% vs. 85%; p = .837), and BMI (36.18 +/- 5.30 vs. 34.68 +/- 5.58; p = .217) between the two groups. OAGB had a shorter mean operation time (121.67 +/- 20.41 vs. 143.50 +/- 25.07 min; p < .001) and a lower intraoperative blood loss (21.92 +/- 12.35 vs. 32.43 +/- 22.01 mL; p = .005), but a longer postoperative flatus passage (2.13 +/- 0.43 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.43 days; p = .007) compared with the SG + OAB group. Two patients (6.7%) developed major surgical complication in SG + OAB group but no major complication developed in OAGB group. At 6 months after surgery, SG + OAB had a higher %total weight loss than OAGB (31.05 +/- 3.12 vs. 28.14 +/- 5.43%; p = .015), but diabetes remission rate was similarly high in both groups.Conclusions: SG + OAB operation had a non-inferior or even better weight loss than OAGB, with a similar glycemic control efficacy. However, the high complication rate of SG + OAB is the major drawback that needs attention.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY WITH ONE ANASTOMOSIS BIPARTITION (SG plus OAB) VERSUS ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS (OAGB): A PILOT STUDY
    Qin, Xiaoguang
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 : 896 - 896
  • [2] Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Adolescents With Obesity
    Sorek, Adi
    Eldar, Sukhotnik Meron
    Cohen, Shlomi
    Mayer, Inbar Mazkeret
    Sukhtnik, Igor
    Lubetzky, Ronit
    Moran-Lev, Hadar
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2023, 77 (01): : 131 - 136
  • [3] Single port sleeve gastrectomy with one anastomosis transit bipartition
    Widjaja, Jason
    Gu, Yan
    Yang, Jianjun
    Dong, Wenpei
    Wang, Rui
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 : 576 - 576
  • [4] Clinical Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity
    Chang Wu
    Rixing Bai
    Wenmao Yan
    Ming Yan
    Maomin Song
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 1021 - 1031
  • [5] Clinical Outcomes of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity
    Wu, Chang
    Bai, Rixing
    Yan, Wenmao
    Yan, Ming
    Song, Maomin
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (03) : 1021 - 1031
  • [6] Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Abu-Abeid, Adam
    Shoham, Gon
    Keidar, Andrei
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (06) : 2274 - 2275
  • [7] The Safety and Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a Revision for Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Jamal, Mohammad H.
    Elabd, Rawan
    AlMutairi, Rawan
    Albraheem, Aqeel
    Alhaj, Ahmad
    Alkhayat, Haytham
    AlHarbi, Obaid
    Almahmeed, Husain
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (06) : 2280 - 2284
  • [8] The Safety and Efficacy of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a Revision for Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Mohammad H. Jamal
    Rawan Elabd
    Rawan AlMutairi
    Aqeel Albraheem
    Ahmad Alhaj
    Haytham Alkhayat
    Obaid AlHarbi
    Husain Almahmeed
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 2280 - 2284
  • [10] SINGLE ANASTOMOSIS ILEAL BYPASS, ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS, SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY OUTCOME FOLLOWED BY SIX MONTHS
    Lin, Yi-Wen
    Soong, Tien-Chou
    Sun, Zhi-Han
    Lee, Wei-Jei
    Chen, Chung-Yen
    Ser, Kong-Han
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 : 890 - 890