Impact of demonstration zone policy on agricultural science and technology innovation: evidence from China

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Nannan [1 ]
Cui, Dengfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shihezi Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shihezi, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EFFICIENCY; AGGLOMERATION;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-023-02292-8
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
As driving forces in agricultural development, science and technology, along with innovation in agricultural science and technology, are crucial to food security and socioeconomic development. The National Modern Agricultural Demonstration Zone is a major initiative of the Chinese government to promote the modernization of agriculture with Chinese characteristics and aims to improve the level of regional agricultural development through policy guidance and financial support. However, few studies have explored the impact of the National Modern Agricultural Demonstration Zone on agricultural science and technology innovation from a policy perspective. In this context, this study is based on the panel data of 696 regions in China from 2007 to 2017. Difference-in-differences is used to study the impact and mechanism of the National Modern Agricultural Demonstration Zone on agricultural science and technology innovation. The results show that the National Modern Agricultural Demonstration Zone policy can significantly improve the level of agricultural science and technology innovation, and the impact effect is more significant in regions with high fiscal autonomy, western regions, and those with better transportation infrastructure. Mechanism analysis shows that the National Modern Agricultural Demonstration Zone enhances agricultural science and technology innovation mainly through increasing financial resource allocation, improving financial support for agriculture, and increasing human capital. This study evaluates the policy effects, provides theoretical support for the public value of the National Modern Agricultural Demonstration Zone, and offers lessons for agricultural science and technology innovation in similar economies in China and worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of demonstration zone policy on agricultural science and technology innovation: evidence from China
    Nannan Wang
    Dengfeng Cui
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [2] Intergovernmental Competition and Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China
    Yu, Daohan
    Wang, Fang
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2025, 15 (05):
  • [3] The impact of technology identification policy on firm innovation: Evidence from China
    Fang, Hongsheng
    Wu, Xiao
    Shen, Jim Huangnan
    Zhao, Lexin
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 76
  • [4] Science, technology and innovation policy to sustain agricultural biotechnology in emerging economies: Evidence from Mexico
    Rodríguez, José Carlos
    Navarro-Chávez, César L.
    Gómez, Mario
    Mier, Margarita
    International Journal of Biotechnology, 2015, 13 (04) : 198 - 229
  • [5] Innovation Networks of Science and Technology Firms: Evidence from China
    Liu, Chenxi
    Peng, Zhenghong
    Liu, Lingbo
    Li, Shixuan
    LAND, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [6] A Study on the Complexity of Science and Technology Innovation Policy in China
    Geng, Zhe
    2017 4TH ICSSH CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT (ICSSH-EDM 2017), 2017, 99 : 132 - 137
  • [7] Innovation, technology policy and regional development: Evidence from China and Australia
    So, BWY
    CHINA JOURNAL, 2004, 52 : 170 - 172
  • [8] Synergy effect of science and technology policies on innovation: Evidence from China
    Pang, Shoulin
    Dou, Shiting
    Li, Huan
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [9] Regional innovation policy mix complexity and enterprise technology innovation: evidence from China
    Ma, Zhaoyuan
    Wang, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Yuan
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [10] Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China's national innovation system
    Zhong Xiwei
    Yang Xiangdong
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2007, 29 (03) : 317 - 325