Does tax symmetry improve corporate innovation investment? Evidence from the change policy of loss carrying forward period in China

被引:3
|
作者
Guo, Fenghua [1 ,2 ]
Huo, Peiyun [3 ,4 ]
Song, Hui [2 ]
Zhang, Duolei [2 ]
Zhou, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Accounting, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, Bengbu 233030, Peoples R China
[3] Zhong Nan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Acccouting, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
[4] Hubei Univ Technol, Engn & Technol Coll, Dept Management, Wuhan 430068, Peoples R China
关键词
Tax symmetry; Loss carry forward period; High-tech enterprises; Investment in enterprise innovation; AGENCY COSTS; RISK; INCENTIVES; FIRM; TAXATION; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.12.021
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Taking China's A-share listed companies with high-tech enterprise qualification from 2015 to 2020 as a sample, we find that the increase of tax symmetry can significantly improve enterprise innovation investment; agency conflict has a significant negative regulatory effect. Further, this paper empirically tests the role path of tax symmetry on enterprise innovation investment. The results show that tax symmetry mainly promotes the level of enterprise innovation investment by improving the level of enterprise risk-taking, which supports the government's "sleeping partner" hypothesis. Therefore, it is suggested that the government should enhance tax symmetry and act as a "sleeping partner" of enterprises, which has important enlightenment significance for stimulating enterprises to increase their enthusiasm for innovation. Under the background of China's emerging economy, this study will contribute to the references of tax policies and enterprise innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 602
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic policy uncertainty exposure and corporate innovation investment: Evidence from China
    Cui, Xin
    Wang, Chunfeng
    Liao, Jing
    Fang, Zhenming
    Cheng, Feiyang
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2021, 67
  • [2] Corporate Investment and Tax Disincentive: Evidence from China
    Xing, Weibo
    FRONTIERS OF ECONOMICS IN CHINA, 2016, 11 (02) : 321 - 350
  • [3] Does Industrial Policy Reduce Corporate Investment Efficiency? Evidence from China
    Wang, Ting
    Wang, Rujun
    Zhang, Hua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [4] Does flattening the government hierarchy improve corporate innovation? Evidence from China
    Liu, Yawei
    Zhang, Zhaoguo
    Zhai, Huayun
    Chan, Kam C.
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 57 (08) : 1559 - 1577
  • [5] Does Internet Infrastructure Construction Improve Corporate Green Innovation? Evidence from China
    Qiu, Lingyue
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [6] Enterprise income tax and corporate innovation: evidence from China
    Fang, Hongsheng
    Dang, Dandan
    Nan, Fu
    Hu, Wen-Quan
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 55 (44) : 5230 - 5249
  • [7] Tax uncertainty and corporate innovation output: evidence from China
    Chen, Wanyi
    Liang, Siyuan
    Zhang, Liguang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2024, 30 (10): : 1127 - 1163
  • [8] Innovation incentives and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China
    Xiang, Junyi
    Shao, Qi
    Fan, Yong
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2025, 85 : 1216 - 1237
  • [9] The impact of tax integrity on corporate innovation: evidence from China
    Wu, Dan
    Zheng, Panpan
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 55 (45) : 5303 - 5316
  • [10] How does export VAT rebates policy affect corporate investment efficiency? Evidence from corporate tax stickiness
    Wang, Xinyi
    Zhu, Ling
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 82