Using natural language processing to characterize and predict homeopathic product-associated adverse events in consumer reviews: comparison to reports to FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

被引:4
|
作者
Konkel, Karen [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Oner, Nurettin [2 ]
Ahmed, Abdulaziz [2 ]
Jones, S. Christopher [1 ]
Berner, Eta S. [2 ,3 ]
Zengul, Ferhat D. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Div Pharmacovigilance, Off Surveillance & Epidemiol, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Hlth Serv Adm, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Informat Inst, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Ctr Integrated Syst, Elect & Comp Engn, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[5] US FDA, 10903,New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
关键词
natural language processing; drug safety; adverse drug event; homeopathic remedies; OTC drugs; consumer preferences;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocad197
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective: Apply natural language processing (NLP) to Amazon consumer reviews to identify adverse events (AEs) associated with unapproved over the counter (OTC) homeopathic drugs and compare findings with reports to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Materials and methods: Data were extracted from publicly available Amazon reviews and analyzed using JMP 16 Pro Text Explorer. Topic modeling identified themes. Sentiment analysis (SA) explored consumer perceptions. A machine learning model optimized prediction of AEs in reviews. Reports for the same time interval and product class were obtained from the FAERS public dashboard and analyzed.Results: Homeopathic cough/cold products were the largest category common to both data sources (Amazon = 616, FAERS = 445) and were analyzed further. Oral symptoms and unpleasant taste were described in both datasets. Amazon reviews describing an AE had lower Amazon ratings (X-2 = 224.28, P < .0001). The optimal model for predicting AEs was Neural Boosted 5-fold combining topic modeling and Amazon ratings as predictors (mean AUC = 0.927).Discussion: Topic modeling and SA of Amazon reviews provided information about consumers' perceptions and opinions of homeopathic OTC cough and cold products. Amazon ratings appear to be a good indicator of the presence or absence of AEs, and identified events were similar to FAERS.Conclusion: Amazon reviews may complement traditional data sources to identify AEs associated with unapproved OTC homeopathic products. This study is the first to use NLP in this context and lays the groundwork for future larger scale efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 78
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correction to: Using natural language processing to characterize and predict homeopathic product-associated adverse events in consumer reviews: comparison to reports to FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) (vol 31, pg 70, 2023)
    Konkel, Karen
    Oner, Nurettin
    Ahmed, Abdulaziz
    Jones, S. Christopher
    Berner, Eta S.
    Zengul, Ferhat D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024, 31 (02) : 548 - 548
  • [2] A disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated to pertuzumab in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
    Shu-peng Zou
    Hai-yun Yang
    Meng-ling Ouyang
    Qian Cheng
    Xuan Shi
    Ming-hui Sun
    BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 24
  • [3] Adverse events associated with brolucizumab: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)
    Xiong, Xiaomei
    Zhang, Xiuwen
    Li, Xiaoxia
    Huang, Taomin
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2024, 23 (11) : 1447 - 1452
  • [4] A disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated to pertuzumab in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
    Zou, Shu-peng
    Yang, Hai-yun
    Ouyang, Meng-ling
    Cheng, Qian
    Shi, Xuan
    Sun, Ming-hui
    BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2023, 24 (01):
  • [5] Evaluation of Ticagrelor Bleeding Adverse Event Reports Compared to Clopidogrel in the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS)
    Fahmy, Ahmed I.
    Mekkawy, Mohamed A.
    Abou-Ali, Adel
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 26 : 186 - 186
  • [6] A disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with loop diuretics in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
    Xue, Zehu
    Liu, Xi
    Liu, Qifeng
    Yang, Xiuming
    Yu, Lixia
    BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [7] Reports of adverse events related with second generation antipsychotics in children in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)
    Zapata, Lorenzo Villa
    Bibbs, Janese
    Crapps, Mariah
    Lumbreras, Ainhoa Gomez
    Malone, Daniel
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 579 - 580
  • [8] Indications and adverse events of teriparatide: based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)
    Wen, Ming-Tao
    Li, Jia-Cheng
    Lu, Bo-Wen
    Shao, Hua-Rong
    Ling, Pei-Xue
    Liu, Fei
    Li, Gang
    Luo, Di
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [9] Contact dermatitis adverse events: A review of contact dermatitis-associated reports from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)
    Taylor, J. S.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 142 (08) : S42 - S42
  • [10] Pharmacovigilance Analysis Of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Events For Inclisiran
    Rajak, Kripa
    Halder, Anupam
    Gautam, Seema Sharma
    Khanal, Resha
    Atrash, Anas
    Goswami, Rohan
    ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 2023, 43