The divergent effects of diversity ideologies for race and gender relations

被引:12
|
作者
Martin, Ashley E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA USA
[2] 655 Knight Way, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Diversity ideologies; Gender awareness; Multiculturalism; Colorblindness; Gender blindness; RACIAL COLOR-BLINDNESS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ESSENTIALISM; SYSTEM JUSTIFICATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; MULTICULTURALISM; STEREOTYPES; IMPACT; PERCEPTIONS; PREJUDICE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104226
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present research compares the influence of diversity ideologies on race and gender relations. In contrast to research suggesting that an identity-aware ideology (i.e., multiculturalism or race-awareness) predicts more support for racial equality than does an identity-blind one (i.e., colorblindness or race-blindness), this paper suggests that the opposite is true for gender. Six studies demonstrate that an identity-aware ideology (compared to an identity-blind one) highlights unique types of race and gender differences, leading to divergent outcomes for race and gender inequality. While race-awareness highlights external, opportunity-based differences, pro-moting support for policies that combat systemic inequality (e.g., affirmative action), gender-awareness high-lights internal, biology-based differences, reifying gender-essentialism, broadly, and gender stereotypes, in particular. Together, this work suggests that the beneficial effects of identity-aware ideologies previously found for race may not be effective for gender. Ultimately, it warns against one-size-fits-all approaches to diversity and offers practical implications for diversity science.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条