Distributed Bayesian Inference in Massive Spatial Data

被引:3
|
作者
Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi [1 ]
Li, Cheng [2 ]
Savitsky, Terrance [3 ]
Srivastava, Sanvesh [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Stat, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[3] US Bur Lab Stat, Washington, DC 20212 USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Iowa City, IA 52240 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Distributed Bayesian inference; Gaussian process; low-rank Gaussian process; massive spatial data; Wasserstein barycenter; GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS; DIVIDE-AND-CONQUER; APPROXIMATION; RATES; LIKELIHOODS; PREDICTION; REGRESSION; CLUSTERS; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1214/22-STS868
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Gaussian process (GP) regression is computationally expensive in spatial applications involving massive data. Various methods address this limitation, including a small number of Bayesian methods based on dis-tributed computations (or the divide-and-conquer strategy). Focusing on the latter literature, we achieve three main goals. First, we develop an extensible Bayesian framework for distributed spatial GP regression that embeds many popular methods. The proposed framework has three steps that partition the entire data into many subsets, apply a readily available Bayesian spatial pro-cess model in parallel on all the subsets, and combine the posterior distri-butions estimated on all the subsets into a pseudo posterior distribution that conditions on the entire data. The combined pseudo posterior distribution replaces the full data posterior distribution in prediction and inference prob-lems. Demonstrating our framework's generality, we extend posterior com-putations for (nondistributed) spatial process models with a stationary full -rank and a nonstationary low-rank GP priors to the distributed setting. Sec-ond, we contrast the empirical performance of popular distributed approaches with some widely-used, nondistributed alternatives and highlight their rela-tive advantages and shortcomings. Third, we provide theoretical support for our numerical observations and show that the Bayes L2-risks of the combined posterior distributions obtained from a subclass of the divide-and-conquer methods achieves the near-optimal convergence rate in estimating the true spatial surface with various types of covariance functions. Additionally, we provide upper bounds on the number of subsets to achieve these near-optimal rates.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 284
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DISTRIBUTED STATISTICAL INFERENCE FOR MASSIVE DATA
    Chen, Song Xi
    Peng, Liuhua
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2021, 49 (05): : 2851 - 2869
  • [2] Practical Bayesian modeling and inference for massive spatial data sets on modest computing environments†
    Zhang, Lu
    Datta, Abhirup
    Banerjee, Sudipto
    STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND DATA MINING, 2019, 12 (03) : 197 - 209
  • [3] Parallel inference for massive distributed spatial data using low-rank models
    Katzfuss, Matthias
    Hammerling, Dorit
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2017, 27 (02) : 363 - 375
  • [4] Parallel inference for massive distributed spatial data using low-rank models
    Matthias Katzfuss
    Dorit Hammerling
    Statistics and Computing, 2017, 27 : 363 - 375
  • [5] Distributed Bayesian posterior voting strategy for massive data
    Li, Xuerui
    Kang, Lican
    Liu, Yanyan
    Wu, Yuanshan
    ELECTRONIC RESEARCH ARCHIVE, 2022, 30 (05): : 1936 - 1953
  • [6] Bayesian Modeling and Inference for Geometrically Anisotropic Spatial Data
    Mark D. Ecker
    Alan E. Gelfand
    Mathematical Geology, 1999, 31 : 67 - 83
  • [7] Bayesian modeling and inference for geometrically anisotropic spatial data
    Ecker, MD
    Gelfand, AE
    MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1999, 31 (01): : 67 - 83
  • [8] Bayesian Inference of Ecological Interactions from Spatial Data
    Stephens, Christopher R.
    Sanchez-Cordero, Victor
    Gonzalez Salazar, Constantino
    ENTROPY, 2017, 19 (12)
  • [9] Meta-Kriging: Scalable Bayesian Modeling and Inference for Massive Spatial Datasets
    Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi
    Banerjee, Sudipto
    TECHNOMETRICS, 2018, 60 (04) : 430 - 444
  • [10] DISTRIBUTED INFERENCE IN BAYESIAN NETWORKS
    DIEZ, FJ
    MIRA, J
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS, 1994, 25 (01) : 39 - 61