Efficacy and safety of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Li, Xueyan [1 ]
Dai, Jie [1 ]
Liu, Qingran [1 ]
Zhao, Zhenying [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Cangzhou City Ctr Hosp, Neurol Dept, Cangzhou 061000, Peoples R China
关键词
Schizophrenia; Cognitive dysfunction; Non -invasive brain stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Meta-analysis; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS; DOUBLE-BLIND; MEMORY; RTMS; HALLUCINATIONS; UPDATE; MOTOR; TDCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.12.003
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Based on existing evidence of the effects of the most commonly used non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), which includes transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the cognitive improvement and safety of NIBS on schizophrenia-related cognitive impairment. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included RCTs; Review Manager, version 5.4.1, was used to perform the statistical analysis. Twenty double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trials involving 997 patients were included. As a result, no significant improvement in cognitive function was observed after NIBS treatment. However, the overall treatment effect of the two main NIBS modes (i.e., rTMS and tDCS) was associated with significantly larger improvements in negative symptoms and good tolerability in patients with schizophrenia compared to sham-controls (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI [-1.03, -0.08], p = 0.02, I-2 = 88%). NIBS model and stimulus parameters influenced the effect of NIBS. More favorable effects were observed in patients who received rTMS stimulation (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI [0.01, 0.49], p = 0.04, I-2 = 0%) in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with a stimulation intensity of 20 Hz (p = 0.004) for a period longer than 1 month (p < 0.05). Yet, due to the limited number of included studies and heterogeneity in both study design and target population, the results of this analysis need to be interpreted with caution.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 186
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognition function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Liu, Hong
    Wu, Mengyuan
    Huang, Haoyu
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Zeng, Peiling
    Xu, Ying
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2024, 101
  • [2] The modulation effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xu, Ying
    Qiu, Zhijie
    Zhu, Jingfang
    Liu, Jiao
    Wu, Jingsong
    Tao, Jing
    Chen, Lidian
    BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [3] The modulation effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ying Xu
    Zhijie Qiu
    Jingfang Zhu
    Jiao Liu
    Jingsong Wu
    Jing Tao
    Lidian Chen
    BMC Neuroscience, 20
  • [4] Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive and motor functions in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Shuiyan
    Zhang, Qi
    Zheng, Shuqi
    Li, Gege
    Li, Shilin
    He, Longlong
    Zeng, Yuting
    Chen, Ling
    Chen, Shuping
    Zheng, Xiaoyan
    Zou, Jihua
    Zeng, Qing
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [5] The cognitive effect of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with cognitive training in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Ting
    Liu, Wentao
    He, Jiali
    Gui, Chenfan
    Meng, Lijiao
    Xu, Li
    Jia, Chengsen
    ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [6] Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis
    Begemann, Marieke J.
    Brand, Bodyl A.
    Curcic-Blake, Branislava
    Aleman, Andre
    Sommer, Iris E.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 50 (15) : 2465 - 2486
  • [7] Efficacy of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Vision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Bello, Umar Muhammad
    Wang, Jingying
    Park, Adela S. Y.
    Tan, Ken W. S.
    Cheung, Wing Sum
    Thompson, Benjamin
    Cheong, Allen M. Y.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [8] Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
    Yan, Mengyu
    Liu, Jiarui
    Guo, Yiming
    Hou, Qingtao
    Song, Jiaqi
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Yu, Weihua
    Lue, Yang
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [9] Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
    Mengyu Yan
    Jiarui Liu
    Yiming Guo
    Qingtao Hou
    Jiaqi Song
    Xiaoqin Wang
    Weihua Yu
    Yang Lü
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 36
  • [10] Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on global cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Teselink, Johannes
    Bawa, Kritleen K.
    Koo, Grace K. Y.
    Sankhe, Krushnaa
    Liu, Celina S.
    Rapoport, Mark
    Oh, Paul
    Marzolini, Susan
    Gallagher, Damien
    Swardfager, Walter
    Herrmann, Nathan
    Lanctot, Krista L.
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2021, 72