Performance investigation of MISO soft sensors in predicting AQI: a comparative analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Aurangzeb, Md [1 ]
Banerjee, Sudip [2 ,4 ]
Das, Dipa [2 ]
Ghosh, Prabir [3 ]
机构
[1] Pandit Deendayal Energy Univ, Sch Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Gandhinagar, India
[2] Indira Gandhi Inst Technol Sarang, Dept Chem Engn, Dhenkanal, India
[3] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Chem Engn, Raipur, India
[4] Indira Gandhi Inst Technol Sarang, Dept Chem Engn, Dhenkanal 759146, Odisha, India
关键词
Air quality index; air pollutant; Bayesian regularisation algorithm; MISO soft sensor; real-time data; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; AIR-POLLUTION; MODEL; FORECAST; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/00194506.2024.2313493
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The present investigation proposes a Bayesian Regularized Artificial Neural Network (BRANN) based multi input single output (MISO) soft sensor. It predicts the value of air quality index (AQI) by receiving measured inlet concentration of different air pollutants such as particulate matter-2.5 (PM2.5), particulate matter-10 (PM10), SO2, NO2, O-3, and CO. The performance of BRANN is also evaluated comparing with other two soft sensors namely, scaled conjugate gradient trained artificial neural network (SCGANN) and Levenberg-Marquardt artificial neural network (LMANN). The Bayesian Regularization (trainbr), trainscg, and Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) feed-forward backpropagation algorithms are used to train BRANN, SCGANN and LMANN, respectively. Hence, for their training and validation, two sets of 24 hours average of real time data released by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) of India for Talcher coalfield and its surrounding area in Odisha from Jan-2019 to Dec-2020 are used. The training performances of all three soft sensors are reasonable (average R-2 values of 0.975452, 0.995533 and 0.998718 for SCGANN, LMANN and BRANN, respectively). Obviously, the LMANN exhibits its superiority over SCGANN (corresponding average R-2 values of 0.811955 and 0.760921). Here, the BRANN overperforms (average R-2 values of 0.891167) other two soft sensors in predicting the AQI.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 220
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance analysis of soft sensors
    Wang, GY
    Chen, YC
    Tan, YH
    Gu, TX
    ICEMI'2001: FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT AND INSTRUMENTS, VOL 1, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 406 - 409
  • [2] Predicting the performance of soft sensors as a route to low cost automation
    Goodwin, Graham C.
    Annual Reviews in Control, 2000, 24 : 55 - 66
  • [3] Predicting the performance of soft sensors as a route to low cost automation
    Goodwin, GC
    LOW COST AUTOMATION 1998 (LCA'98), 1999, : 9 - 20
  • [4] A comparative analysis of techniques for predicting academic performance
    Nghe, Nguyen Thai
    Janecek, Paul
    Haddawy, Peter
    2007 37TH ANNUAL FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, GLOBAL ENGINEERING : KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT BORDERS - OPPORTUNITIES WITHOUT PASSPORTS, VOLS 1- 4, 2007, : 290 - 295
  • [5] Comparative investigation of VOC sensors
    Bruns, Alfred
    Knissel, Jens
    Schmidt, Ralf-Gunther
    BAUPHYSIK, 2020, 42 (04) : 196 - 202
  • [6] SOFT SKILLS AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE: CONCEPTS FOR COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Moura, Denise
    Zotes, Luis Perez
    SISTEMAS & GESTAO, 2015, 10 (02): : 254 - 269
  • [7] Predicting Oil Product Properties with Intelligent Soft Sensors
    Bakhtadze, Natalia
    Sakrutina, Ekaterina
    Pyatetsky, Valery
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 14632 - 14637
  • [8] Comparative investigation on the performance of spot positioning sensors in point-autofocus microscopy
    Song, Huixu
    Li, Qingwei
    Shi, Zhaoyao
    OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 183
  • [9] A Comparative Feasibility Analysis for Sensing Swelling with Textile-based Soft Strain Sensors
    Golgouneh, Alireza
    Molla, Md Tahmidul Islam
    Dunne, Lucy E.
    ISWC'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WEARABLE COMPUTERS, 2019, : 60 - 65
  • [10] ITEM-ANALYSIS PROGRAMS - COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF PERFORMANCE
    SCHNITTJER, CJ
    CARTLEDGE, CM
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1976, 36 (01) : 183 - 187